From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.chez-thomas.org (mail.mlbassoc.com [65.100.170.105]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF00175870 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 15:50:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 1998) id BA26DF811DA; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 09:50:40 -0600 (MDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on hermes.chez-thomas.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 Received: from [192.168.1.114] (zeus [192.168.1.114]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 437B5F811DA; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 09:50:40 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <55AE6A64.1040903@mlbassoc.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 09:51:00 -0600 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <55AE6705.5040907@mlbassoc.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [yocto] Question about IMAGE_INSTALL_append and CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 15:50:41 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2015-07-21 09:45, Victor Rodriguez wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: >> On 2015-07-21 09:26, Victor Rodriguez wrote: >>> >>> Hi team >>> >>> I have a question , according to documentation there is a difference >>> between >>> >>> IMAGE_INSTALL_append >>> >>> and >>> >>> CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL >>> >>> Specifies the list of packages to be added to the image. You should >>> only set this variable in the local.conf configuration file found in >>> the Build Directory. >>> >>> When I use the second one and try to build a core-image-minimal-xfce >>> bitbake does not install what I wanted in my image . I had a really >>> hard time few weekends ago because of this. >>> >>> I wonder If I am missing something or if this is a bug >> >> >> The core-image-minimal-xfce recipe does not "play nice" with >> the core-image class and is not respecting CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL. >> >> I think this should be filed as a bug (and feel free to suggest a patch) >> >> BTW, this question should really be on the OpenEmbedded development list. > > > Thanks Gary > > I will submit the BUG , do you know the Bugzila where I should submit it ? The main Yocto project bugzilla: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/ -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------