From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] tools/libx{l, c}: Remove the toolstack_{save, restore} callbacks Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:07:29 +0100 Message-ID: <55AF7971.2000205@citrix.com> References: <1437388679-16468-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> <1437388679-16468-3-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> <1437560870.12884.7.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1437560870.12884.7.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell , Xen-devel Cc: Wei Liu , Ian Jackson List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 22/07/15 11:27, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 11:37 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> +TOOLSTACK (deprecated) >> +---------------------- >> + >> +> *This record was only present for transitionary purposes during > "transitionary" isn't really a word... transitional is (even if it > sounds a bit odd to me)? It very much is. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/transition It is an appropriate derivative in this case. > >> +> development. It is should not be used.* > Does it needs to be accepted on restore for N->N+1 purposes (or N+M for > M>1 since you care about that)? Or does the conversion routine turn it > into something else? The libxc toolstack record was used in the #LIBXL_HVM_COMPAT phase, but nothing (not even the conversion script) will generate one any more. ~Andrew