From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [v11][PATCH 11/16] tools/libxl: detect and avoid
 conflicts with RDM
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 21:33:58 +0800
Message-ID: <55AF9BC6.4030200@intel.com>
References: <1437528607-19315-1-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com>
	<1437528607-19315-12-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com>
	<21935.39327.738755.273206@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <21935.39327.738755.273206@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 2015/7/22 21:24, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Tiejun Chen writes ("[v11][PATCH 11/16] tools/libxl: detect and avoid conflicts with RDM"):
>> Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
>
> I have dropped Wei's ack on this from my git branch, as it was clearly
> inappropriate to retain it.  (v11 was acked by me, so there is no need
> for a re-review by Wei unless he feels it would be useful.)

Ian,

Sounds you start to merge them into your tree?

But now Jan is trying to update patch #1 as you see. I think something 
needs to be synced on tool sides. Although that is not finished, at 
least three changes exist:

#1. PCI_DEV_RDM_ALL -> XENMEM_RDM_ALL
#2. new public memop interface structure

#2.1
+    union {
+        struct physdev_pci_device pci;
+    } dev;

#2.2 flag -> flags

Thanks
Tiejun