Re: reproducable panic eviction work queue

[Frank Schreuder <fschreuder@transip.nl>]

Op 7/22/2015 om 4:14 PM schreef Nikolay Aleksandrov:
> On 07/22/2015 04:03 PM, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>> On 07/22/2015 03:58 PM, Florian Westphal wrote:
>>> Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
>>>> On 07/22/2015 10:17 AM, Frank Schreuder wrote:
>>>>> I got some additional information from syslog:
>>>>>
>>>>> Jul 22 09:49:33 dommy0 kernel: [  675.987890] NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 22s! [kworker/3:1:42]
>>>>> Jul 22 09:49:42 dommy0 kernel: [  685.114033] INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU { 3}  (t=39918 jiffies g=988 c=987 q=23168)
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Frank
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> It looks like it's happening because of the evict_again logic, I think we should also
>>>> add Florian's first suggestion about simplifying it to the patch and just skip the
>>>> entry if we can't delete its timer otherwise we can restart the eviction and see
>>>> entries that already had their timer stopped by us and can keep restarting for
>>>> a long time.
>>>> Here's an updated patch that removes the evict_again logic.
>>> Thanks Nik.  I'm afraid this adds bug when netns is exiting.
>>>
>>> Currently, we wait until timer has finished, but after the change
>>> we might destroy percpu counter while a timer is still executing on
>>> another cpu.
>>>
>>> I pushed a patch series to
>>> https://git.breakpoint.cc/cgit/fw/net.git/log/?h=inetfrag_fixes_02
>>>
>>> It includes this patch with a small change -- deferral of the percpu
>>> counter subtraction until after queue has been free'd.
>>>
>>> Frank -- it would be great if you could test with the four patches in
>>> that series applied.
>>>
>>> I'll then add your tested-by Tag to all of them before submitting this.
>>>
>>> Thanks again for all your help in getting this fixed!
>>>
>> Sure, I didn't think it through, just supplied it for the test. :-)
>> Thanks for fixing it up!
>>
> Patches look great, even the INET_FRAG_EVICTED flag will not be accidentally cleared
> this way. I'll give them a try.
>
>

Hi,

I'm currently building a new kernel bases on 3.18.19 + patches.
One of the patches however fails to apply as we dont have a 
"net/ieee802154/6lowpan/" directory.
Modifying the patch to use "net/ieee802154/reassembly.c" does work 
without problems.
Is this a due to the different kernel version or something else?

I'll come back to you as soon as I have my first test results.

Thanks,
Frank