All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: chenyu5 <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
To: joeyli <jlee@suse.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	"Tian, YeX" <yex.tian@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] PM / hibernate: make sure each resuming page is in current memory zones
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:42:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55B07ECB.9070200@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150723053432.GI23137@linux-rxt1.site>

On 2015年07月23日 13:34, joeyli wrote:
> Hi Chen Yu,
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 08:58:11AM +0000, Chen, Yu C wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw@rjwysocki.net]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 9:04 AM
>>> To: Chen, Yu C
>>> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; Wysocki, Rafael J; joeyli; Tian, YeX
>>> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] PM / hibernate: make sure each resuming page is
>>> in current memory zones
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 09:28:32 AM chenyu5 wrote:
>>>> On 2015年07月16日 08:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>> On Monday, July 06, 2015 04:37:39 PM joeyli wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Chen Yu,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 04:00:42PM +0800, chenyu5 wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi, Joey
>>>>>>> thanks for your reply,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2015年07月02日 14:19, joeyli wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Chen Yu,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:54:28PM +0800, Chen Yu wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Commit 84c91b7ae07c ("PM / hibernate: avoid unsafe pages in e820
>>>>>>>>> reserved
>>>>>>>>> regions") was reverted, because this patch makes resume from
>>>>>>>>> hibernation on Lenovo x230 unreliable. But reverting may bring
>>>>>>>>> back the kernel exception firstly reported in former patch. In
>>>>>>>>> general, there are three problems in current code when resuming
>>> from hibernation:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1.Resuming page may also be in second kernel's e820 reserved
>>> region.
>>>>>>>>> BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000069d4f000-0x0000000069e12fff]
>>> reserved
>>>>>>>>> this causes kernel exception described in Commit 84c91b7ae07c
>>>>>>>>> ("PM / hibernate: avoid unsafe pages in e820 reserved regions")
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2.If Commit 84c91b7ae07c ("PM / hibernate: avoid unsafe pages in
>>>>>>>>> e820 reserved regions") is applied to fix problem 1, and if
>>>>>>>>> E820_RESERVED_KERN regions causes some regions at e820 table
>>> not
>>>>>>>>> page aligned, e820_mark_nosave_regions will misjudgment the
>>>>>>>>> non-page aligned space to be "hole" space and add to nosave
>>> regions, this causes resuming failed.
>>>>>>>>> Refer to https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96111 for
>>> detail.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sorry for I am not fully understand why checking pfn_valid could
>>>>>>>> avoid the above 2. issue?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [Yu] According to e820_mark_nosave_regions, two kinds of e820
>>>>>>> regions will be regarded as nosave:
>>>>>>> a.e820.map holes between each e820entry b.e820entry with
>>>>>>> (!E820_RAM && !E820_RESERVED_KERN) dmesg in
>>>>>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96111
>>>>>>> shows that:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000005baff000-0x00000000d684ffff] usable
>>>>>>> reserve setup_data: [mem 0x000000009d3e0018-0x000000009d3f0057]
>>>>>>> usable
>>>>>>> PM: Registered nosave memory: [mem 0x9d3e0000-0x9d3e0fff]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> e820 map was changed by situation a, but it should not be added to
>>>>>>> nosave list, right?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and according to saveable_page, only pages in the zone will be saved:
>>>>>>> if (page_zone(page_ != zone)
>>>>>>> 	return NULL;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The function of is_valid_orig_page in this patch treats setup_data
>>>>>>> as valid page, so I think this workaround issue 2.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Per my understood should waiting Yinghai Lu's patches for killing
>>>>>>>> E820_RESERVED_KERN to avoid the aligned problem.
>>>>>>> [Yu] yes, it is a graceful solution, but I don't see that in 4.1?
>>>>>>> And we encountered problem 3 in our testing enviroment, so I wrote
>>>>>>> a patch to deal with it first.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot!
>>>>>>>> Joey Lee
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for your explanation, then your patch makes sense to me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please feel free to add tag:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <joeyli.kernel@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Patch queued up for 4.3, thanks!
>>>>>
>>>> Hi Rafeal,
>>>> Please help drop this patch for now, QA has found some problems with
>>>> this patch applied, we're working on it now. Sorry for inconvenience.
>>>
>>> Dropping, thanks for the heads up!
>>>
>> Hi,Rafeal, Joey
>> I've sent out another patch, it is based on Joey's
>> original patch, and it treats any adjacent E820_RAM/E820_RESERVED_KERN regions as
>> one. In this way,  non-page-aligned setup_data address would not be added
>> to nosave regions, thus workaround the hibernation failor mentiones in
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96111
>>
>> V1 patch has a problem that, NOT every page in page zone has a valid mapping address , thus
>> accessing these pages would cause problem. So I rewrite this path and send out another V2 version.
>> Thanks for your time.
>>
>>   Yu
>>>
>
> Thanks for your work on this patch, but the E820_RESERVED_KERN will be removed
> anyhow. So I prefer waiting Yinghai Lu's patch for killing E820_RESERVED_KERN.
>
OK. I'll wait for Yinghai's patch and yours.
Thanks.

Yu
>
> Regards
> Joey Lee
>


      reply	other threads:[~2015-07-23  5:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-30 15:54 [RFC PATCH] PM / hibernate: make sure each resuming page is in current memory zones Chen Yu
2015-07-02  6:19 ` joeyli
2015-07-02  8:00   ` chenyu5
2015-07-06  8:37     ` joeyli
2015-07-16  0:30       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-21  1:28         ` chenyu5
2015-07-22  1:03           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-22  8:58             ` Chen, Yu C
2015-07-23  5:34               ` joeyli
2015-07-23  5:42                 ` chenyu5 [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55B07ECB.9070200@intel.com \
    --to=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=jlee@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=yex.tian@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.