diff for duplicates of <55B62A1B.6030601@redhat.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index b6dcd05..ebccec0 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Hi, -On 27-07-15 14:36, public_timo.s at silentcreek.de wrote: +On 27-07-15 14:36, public_timo.s-fWgRPtSzPNU3WX+qO2AYSQ@public.gmane.org wrote: > Hi again, > > one more thing... @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ On 27-07-15 14:36, public_timo.s at silentcreek.de wrote: > > If we stick to the standard operating points, shouldn't we honor their voltages > as well? If we set the minimum voltage for dcdc2 to 1.0V (as you did) or 1.05V -> (as I did), this means that the lowest operating point of 144MHz at 0.9V defined +> (as I did), this means that the lowest operating point of 144MHz@0.9V defined > in sun7i-a20.dtsi (and with my definition the 312MHz opp as well) will not be > available because cpufreq-dt simply ignores operating points that aren't within > the set voltage range for that regulator. @@ -26,3 +26,7 @@ voltage to go that low in the regulator settings ? Regards, Hans +-- +To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in +the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org +More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index e3c3a80..cd5c38d 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,15 +1,28 @@ "ref\01437960486-2809-1-git-send-email-public_timo.s@silentcreek.de\0" "ref\055B5E6DB.8020009@redhat.com\0" "ref\020150727123653.36C046C8007E@dd34104.kasserver.com\0" - "From\0hdegoede@redhat.com (Hans de Goede)\0" - "Subject\0[linux-sunxi] [RFC] ARM: dts: sunxi: Add regulators and board-specific operating points for LeMaker BananaPi\0" + "ref\020150727123653.36C046C8007E-RzmsueL7+k6AvxNu/8lEInnhMCiq3JZZ@public.gmane.org\0" + "From\0Hans de Goede <hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>\0" + "Subject\0Re: [linux-sunxi] [RFC] ARM: dts: sunxi: Add regulators and board-specific operating points for LeMaker BananaPi\0" "Date\0Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:54:51 +0200\0" - "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0public_timo.s-fWgRPtSzPNU3WX+qO2AYSQ@public.gmane.org" + robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org + pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org + mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org + ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org + galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org + linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org + maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org + devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org + linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org + linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org + " linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org\0" + "Cc\0wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "Hi,\n" "\n" - "On 27-07-15 14:36, public_timo.s at silentcreek.de wrote:\n" + "On 27-07-15 14:36, public_timo.s-fWgRPtSzPNU3WX+qO2AYSQ@public.gmane.org wrote:\n" "> Hi again,\n" ">\n" "> one more thing...\n" @@ -21,7 +34,7 @@ ">\n" "> If we stick to the standard operating points, shouldn't we honor their voltages\n" "> as well? If we set the minimum voltage for dcdc2 to 1.0V (as you did) or 1.05V\n" - "> (as I did), this means that the lowest operating point of 144MHz at 0.9V defined\n" + "> (as I did), this means that the lowest operating point of 144MHz@0.9V defined\n" "> in sun7i-a20.dtsi (and with my definition the 312MHz opp as well) will not be\n" "> available because cpufreq-dt simply ignores operating points that aren't within\n" "> the set voltage range for that regulator.\n" @@ -34,6 +47,10 @@ "\n" "Regards,\n" "\n" - Hans + "Hans\n" + "--\n" + "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe devicetree\" in\n" + "the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org\n" + More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -6d3424b8f36a07893cb58eb0f5fad9856b656613ee5914abde60fff2a3e81d28 +33bd48c38b4a953c6e5811e81940cefe39f1a4173b3720521e9fc069abd2201a
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index b6dcd05..c10f180 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Hi, -On 27-07-15 14:36, public_timo.s at silentcreek.de wrote: +On 27-07-15 14:36, public_timo.s@silentcreek.de wrote: > Hi again, > > one more thing... @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ On 27-07-15 14:36, public_timo.s at silentcreek.de wrote: > > If we stick to the standard operating points, shouldn't we honor their voltages > as well? If we set the minimum voltage for dcdc2 to 1.0V (as you did) or 1.05V -> (as I did), this means that the lowest operating point of 144MHz at 0.9V defined +> (as I did), this means that the lowest operating point of 144MHz@0.9V defined > in sun7i-a20.dtsi (and with my definition the 312MHz opp as well) will not be > available because cpufreq-dt simply ignores operating points that aren't within > the set voltage range for that regulator. diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index e3c3a80..86e88f7 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -1,15 +1,27 @@ "ref\01437960486-2809-1-git-send-email-public_timo.s@silentcreek.de\0" "ref\055B5E6DB.8020009@redhat.com\0" "ref\020150727123653.36C046C8007E@dd34104.kasserver.com\0" - "From\0hdegoede@redhat.com (Hans de Goede)\0" - "Subject\0[linux-sunxi] [RFC] ARM: dts: sunxi: Add regulators and board-specific operating points for LeMaker BananaPi\0" + "From\0Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>\0" + "Subject\0Re: [linux-sunxi] [RFC] ARM: dts: sunxi: Add regulators and board-specific operating points for LeMaker BananaPi\0" "Date\0Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:54:51 +0200\0" - "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0public_timo.s@silentcreek.de" + robh+dt@kernel.org + pawel.moll@arm.com + mark.rutland@arm.com + ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk + galak@codeaurora.org + linux@arm.linux.org.uk + maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com + devicetree@vger.kernel.org + linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + " linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com\0" + "Cc\0wens@csie.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "Hi,\n" "\n" - "On 27-07-15 14:36, public_timo.s at silentcreek.de wrote:\n" + "On 27-07-15 14:36, public_timo.s@silentcreek.de wrote:\n" "> Hi again,\n" ">\n" "> one more thing...\n" @@ -21,7 +33,7 @@ ">\n" "> If we stick to the standard operating points, shouldn't we honor their voltages\n" "> as well? If we set the minimum voltage for dcdc2 to 1.0V (as you did) or 1.05V\n" - "> (as I did), this means that the lowest operating point of 144MHz at 0.9V defined\n" + "> (as I did), this means that the lowest operating point of 144MHz@0.9V defined\n" "> in sun7i-a20.dtsi (and with my definition the 312MHz opp as well) will not be\n" "> available because cpufreq-dt simply ignores operating points that aren't within\n" "> the set voltage range for that regulator.\n" @@ -36,4 +48,4 @@ "\n" Hans -6d3424b8f36a07893cb58eb0f5fad9856b656613ee5914abde60fff2a3e81d28 +c42d203aac474dba72fb955d25c8fa0b76c2969c5ec50ac7231677f37ec0d2cf
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.