From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753754AbbG0QUU (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jul 2015 12:20:20 -0400 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:46364 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752533AbbG0QUS (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jul 2015 12:20:18 -0400 Message-ID: <55B659EC.5030009@oracle.com> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 12:18:52 -0400 From: Boris Ostrovsky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andy Lutomirski CC: Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , "security@kernel.org" , X86 ML , Borislav Petkov , Sasha Levin , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Andrew Cooper , Jan Beulich , xen-devel Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option References: <55B64FEA.70204@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/27/2015 11:53 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Boris Ostrovsky > wrote: >> On 07/25/2015 01:36 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>> Here's v3. It fixes the "dazed and confused" issue, I hope. It's also >>> probably a good general attack surface reduction, and it replaces some >>> scary code with IMO less scary code. >>> >>> Also, servers and embedded systems should probably turn off modify_ldt. >>> This makes that possible. >>> >>> Xen people, can you take a look at this? >>> >>> Willy and Kees: I left the config option alone. The -tiny people will >>> like it, and we can always add a sysctl of some sort later. >>> >>> Changes from v3: >>> - Hopefully fixed Xen. >> >> 32b-on-32b fails in the same manner. (but non-zero LDT is taken care of) >> >>> - Fixed 32-bit test case on 32-bit native kernel. >> >> I am not sure I see what changed. > I misplaced the fix in the wrong git commit, so I failed to sent it. Oops. > > I just sent v4.1 of patch 3. Can you try that? I am hitting BUG() in Xen code (returning from a hypercall) when freeing LDT in destroy_context(). Interestingly though when I run the test in the debugger I get SIGILL (just like before) but no BUG(). Let me get back to you on that later today. -boris