From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([59.151.112.132]:4416 "EHLO heian.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752739AbbG1AZr (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jul 2015 20:25:47 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] btrfs-progs: qgroup related enhance. To: , , References: <1425025599-30048-1-git-send-email-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> <20150323233803.GP20767@twin.jikos.cz> <5510B191.1010402@cn.fujitsu.com> <20150727143509.GF6306@twin.jikos.cz> From: Qu Wenruo Message-ID: <55B6CC07.5000301@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 08:25:43 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150727143509.GF6306@twin.jikos.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: David Sterba wrote on 2015/07/27 16:35 +0200: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 08:36:33AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: >>> All of the above merged. >>> >>>> btrfs-progs: Schedule quota rescan if qgroup assign caused >>>> inconsistence. >>> >>> The rescan can be a long running operation and touches a lot of >>> metadata, so I'd rather avoid starting the rescan automatically. Right >>> now the user may start rescan manually, or please add an commandline >>> option (eg. --rescan) to do the rescan in one go with the 'assign' >>> command. Thanks. >>> >> Makes sense, I'll update the last patch soon. > > I've merged your patch without changes and implemented the --rescan > option myself. > Oh, I forgot to update this one... Thanks a lot for implement --rescan option. Thanks, Qu