From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Don Slutz <don.slutz@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/8] Xen VMware tools support
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 23:18:03 -0400
Message-ID: <55B6F46B.2060906@Gmail.com>
References: <1435447665-5433-1-git-send-email-Don.Slutz@Gmail.com>
	<559FA13B020000780008F41F@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<20150710090729.GE26853@zion.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150710090729.GE26853@zion.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>, Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>, Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 07/10/15 05:07, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 09:40:59AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 28.06.15 at 01:27, <don.slutz@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Changes v11 to v12:
>>>   Rebased on staging.
>>>


>>
>> I was actually meaning to apply this (at least until patch 6; I'm
>> not convinced patch 7 makes sense to go in at this point), but
>> noticed that comments by Konrad were still un-addressed. I'm
>> also expecting some re-basing to be needed on top of Paul's
>> emulation re-work.
>>

My understanding of Konrad's comments are:

For patch #2:
  adjust a comment that is removed in patch #4.
    I did this, but failed to get it posted before leaving on
    vacation (sigh).

    Adjust copyright date from 2012 to 2015 (but not required).


For patch #3:
  Perhaps add 'Recommended value is 7' ?
    I did not take this as a required change.


For patch #7 (which also need a lot of merge work) I was waiting till
Paul's changes had been committed.  Now that they are I will be working
on the merge,

>> Wei, considering that this had already missed 4.5, would you
>> be okay to take at least first 6 patches (which seem reasonably
>> risk free) after the freeze?
>>
> 
> Yes. I think it is fine, but please do it as soon as possible,
> preferably within next week.
> 

I see that this did not happen.  Do you want me to re-post just 1 to 6
that I have now rebased? (the improvement to the doc, Ian said could be
a follow on patch)

    -Don Slutz

> Wei.
> 
>> Jan