From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50964) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZKSPd-0003cU-2J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:32:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZKSPV-0000IU-RS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:32:53 -0400 Received: from [59.151.112.132] (port=16606 helo=heian.cn.fujitsu.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZKSPV-0000E2-4w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:32:45 -0400 Message-ID: <55B8E3E8.90904@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 22:32:08 +0800 From: Yang Hongyang MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1438167116-29270-1-git-send-email-yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com> <1438167116-29270-2-git-send-email-yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com> <1291287430.378249.1438178034593.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <55B8DDB2.9080607@cn.fujitsu.com> <549013493.403650.1438179631766.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <549013493.403650.1438179631766.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/12] net: add a new object netfilter List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thomas Huth Cc: zhang zhanghailiang , jasowang@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com, stefanha@redhat.com On 07/29/2015 10:20 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: > On Wednesday, July 29, 2015 4:05:38 PM, > "Yang Hongyang" wrote: >> >> On 07/29/2015 09:53 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: >>> On Wednesday, July 29, 2015 12:51:45 PM, >>> "Yang Hongyang" wrote: >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Hongyang >>> >>> Maybe add at least a very short patch description? You're doing >>> a little bit more than just "add a new object netfilter" as >>> mentioned in the title... >> >> How about: >> Add a new object netfilter, used to capture packets send/receive >> by network backend, init it after init net clients. > > I rather thought about a short remark about the fact that this > patch also adds the "-netfilter" option. So maybe something > like this: > > "Add the framework for a new netfilter object and a new > -netfilter CLI option as a basis for the following patches" > > ? Seems better, thank you, will update! > > Thomas > . > -- Thanks, Yang.