From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com>,
"linux-perf-use." <linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: perf CPU profiling in Xen guest fail & workaround
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:15:45 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55B92661.7010309@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE40pdd6Ab9w1da7ztwed+h9NUbtLyqiC1-tarrGQsFo2MrmzQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 7/29/15 1:04 PM, Brendan Gregg wrote:
> G'Day perf users,
>
> I just debugged something and wanted to share in case others hit
> this... perf CPU profiling didn't work for this Linux 4.1 guest (AWS
> EC2):
>
> # ./perf record -F 99 -a -g -- sleep 5
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.300 MB perf.data ]
> # ./perf script
> #
>
> There are no CPU samples recorded (perf.data just has
> PERF_RECORD_MMAP, etc). I believe it's because it's using the "cycles"
> PMC event, and not "cpu-clock". And cycles is bogus:
>
> # ./perf stat -e cycles -a sleep 1 2>&1 | grep cycles
> 68,719,476,704 cycles
> # ./perf stat -e cycles -a sleep 2 2>&1 | grep cycles
> 68,719,476,704 cycles
>
> I can fix it by profiling cpu-clock:
>
> # ./perf record -e cpu-clock -a -g -- sleep 5
> [ perf record: Woken up 27 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 9.884 MB perf.data (105989 samples) ]
> # ./perf script
> [...data...]
>
> Which is what I think all my other systems are doing anyway; some perf
> -v -v output from those other systems:
>
> [...]
> sys_perf_event_open: pid -1 cpu 0 group_fd -1 flags 0x8
> sys_perf_event_open failed, error -2
> Warning:
> The cycles event is not supported, trying to fall back to cpu-clock-ticks
> [...]
>
> This 4.1 system has these:
>
> # cat /sys/devices/cpu/events/cpu-cycles
> event=0x3c
>
> Which other systems don't. Profiling these (eg, -e r003c) also doesn't work.
>
> So I can use "-e cpu-clock", which is fine. It even lets me set the
> profile frequency:
>
> # ./perf record -F 99 -e cpu-clock -a -- sleep 1
>
> Maybe this issue is already known and fixed in latest. I couldn't find
> anything in a search...
>
It's a known problem with VMs (Solaris based ldoms and apparently xen
guests as examples). The hypervisor tells perf it has a PMU (see dmesg |
grep Performance) but does not really implement it (no NMIs for example).
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-29 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-29 19:04 perf CPU profiling in Xen guest fail & workaround Brendan Gregg
2015-07-29 19:15 ` David Ahern [this message]
2015-07-29 19:27 ` Brendan Gregg
2015-07-29 20:02 ` David Ahern
2015-07-29 22:21 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55B92661.7010309@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.