From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Cong Wang <cwang@twopensource.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: sched: fix refcount imbalance in actions
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 02:55:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55B9760B.10004@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHA+R7MVFhv1_J=0QE6zjCiVtCCKsaU=WgX6eH-u3op7GLZW5w@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/30/2015 02:33 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
...
> diff --git a/net/sched/act_api.c b/net/sched/act_api.c
> index af427a3..bd63a39 100644
> --- a/net/sched/act_api.c
> +++ b/net/sched/act_api.c
> @@ -53,8 +53,11 @@ int tcf_hash_release(struct tc_action *a, int bind)
> if (p) {
> if (bind)
> p->tcfc_bindcnt--;
> - else if (p->tcfc_bindcnt > 0)
> - return -EPERM;
> + else {
> + if (p->tcfc_bindcnt > 0)
> + return -EPERM;
> + return ret;
> + }
Hm, so this seems not correct: if we only ever increase tcfc_refcnt
when there's bind=1, and only ever decrease when bind=1, then we
will never free the action as we do start out from ref=1 in case
it has been added without initial binding, if I see this correctly.
> p->tcfc_refcnt--;
> if (p->tcfc_bindcnt <= 0 && p->tcfc_refcnt <= 0) {
> @@ -214,9 +217,10 @@ int tcf_hash_check(u32 index, struct tc_action
> *a, int bind)
> struct tcf_hashinfo *hinfo = a->ops->hinfo;
> struct tcf_common *p = NULL;
> if (index && (p = tcf_hash_lookup(index, hinfo)) != NULL) {
> - if (bind)
> + if (bind) {
> p->tcfc_bindcnt++;
> - p->tcfc_refcnt++;
> + p->tcfc_refcnt++;
> + }
> a->priv = p;
> return 1;
> }
> diff --git a/net/sched/act_mirred.c b/net/sched/act_mirred.c
> index a42a3b2..2685450 100644
> --- a/net/sched/act_mirred.c
> +++ b/net/sched/act_mirred.c
> @@ -98,6 +98,8 @@ static int tcf_mirred_init(struct net *net, struct
> nlattr *nla,
> return ret;
> ret = ACT_P_CREATED;
> } else {
> + if (bind)
> + return 0;
> if (!ovr) {
> tcf_hash_release(a, bind);
> return -EEXIST;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-30 0:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-29 21:35 [PATCH net] net: sched: fix refcount imbalance in actions Daniel Borkmann
2015-07-30 0:33 ` Cong Wang
2015-07-30 0:55 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2015-07-30 18:48 ` Cong Wang
2015-07-30 20:01 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-07-30 21:21 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55B9760B.10004@iogearbox.net \
--to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=cwang@twopensource.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.