From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Guoqing Jiang <gqJiang@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Safeguard against writing to an active device of
 another node
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:18:20 +0800
Message-ID: <55B9977C.6010909@suse.com>
References: <1436172732-21021-1-git-send-email-gqjiang@suse.com> <1436172732-21021-3-git-send-email-gqjiang@suse.com> <20150729172853.33d44808@noble> <55B8ADE1.1060708@suse.com> <20150730080247.20f03d23@noble> <55B96474.6080604@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <55B96474.6080604@suse.de>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

Hi Goldwyn,
>> Probably something like that - yes.  Unfortunately your mailer messed
>> that up more that usual make it rather difficult to apply.
>>
>> I was wondering if we could make it a run-time dependency though .. a
>> bit like get_cluster_name.  We can still do that later I guess.  I'm
>> not really sure what is best at the moment.
>>
>
>
> Yes, I would second that: Making these functions a run-time
> dependency. We should have the ability for it to work by just
> installing libdlm (with the proper flags set), rather than recompiling
> the package for cluster features.
>
NP, I should take a look at get_cluster_name first.

Thanks,
Guoqing