From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: hammer/firefly backports upgrade suite Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 10:03:31 +0200 Message-ID: <55B9DA53.9050904@dachary.org> References: <55B946D0.3070308@dachary.org> <55B9D0D7.607@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fdSPFdRsrmiW9BJqE07Urjw6BMGDHQ1Wp" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:58672 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750868AbbG3IDi (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2015 04:03:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <55B9D0D7.607@suse.cz> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Nathan Cutler , Abhishek L Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --fdSPFdRsrmiW9BJqE07Urjw6BMGDHQ1Wp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 30/07/2015 09:23, Nathan Cutler wrote: >> It turns out the mistake was to use upgrade/firefly-x and upgrade/hamm= er-x instead of upgrade/firelfy and upgrade/hammer. When -c hammer-backpo= rts or -c firefly-backports is given to teuthology-suite, it will upgrade= to this version, from older versions of the same stable branch. >> >> I've updated: >> >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11644#upgrade >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11990#upgrade >> >> whith the fix and they are running (using the OpenStack cluster though= , there may be issues with the firefly upgrade suite but the hammer upgra= de suite must run fine, it has run at http://ceph.aevoo.fr:8081/ enough t= imes to suggest there are no OpenStack specific issues). >=20 > Hi Loic: >=20 > As you predicted, the firefly upgrade suite finished with quite a few f= ailures. I looked at the first one and the log said: >=20 > ERROR:teuthology.misc:. teuthology/test/integration/openrc.sh && openst= ack network show -f json unknown error ERROR: openstack No networks with = a name or ID of 'unknown' found >=20 > Nathan These can be ignored. I'll fix that so it does not show in the future. Cheers --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --fdSPFdRsrmiW9BJqE07Urjw6BMGDHQ1Wp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlW52lMACgkQ8dLMyEl6F20v3wCdFrNQKCl6F8f3vT5NPXP6fJIl 1H0AoKxxUBxgJQ79jp9JTm6QrvCOZvVo =6VOG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fdSPFdRsrmiW9BJqE07Urjw6BMGDHQ1Wp--