From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH for 4.6] x86/hvm.c: fix regression in guest destruction Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 10:55:23 +0100 Message-ID: <55B9F48B.8050901@citrix.com> References: <1438187962-4047-1-git-send-email-ravi.sahita@intel.com> <55B902F6.3040005@citrix.com> <1438248061.11600.265.camel@citrix.com> <1438248776.11600.270.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZKkYi-0007Ub-Ko for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 09:55:28 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1438248776.11600.270.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell , Ravi Sahita , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com, tim@xen.org, wei.liu2@citrix.com, edmund.h.white@intel.com, JBeulich@suse.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 30/07/15 10:32, Ian Campbell wrote: > Also how come HVMOP_altp2m_set_domain_state does not have a > hvm_altp2m_supported check? (For the benefit of not leaving this question unanswered) There is an early exit at the top of do_altp2m_op(), ahead of even reading the hypercall body from the guest. ~Andrew