From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH for-4.6] xl/libxl: disable PV vNUMA Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 16:55:25 +0100 Message-ID: <55BA48ED.1000409@citrix.com> References: <1438269159-29519-1-git-send-email-wei.liu2@citrix.com> <55BA4332.2060208@citrix.com> <20150730154502.GI26074@zion.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZKqBE-0006Eg-AR for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:55:36 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20150730154502.GI26074@zion.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Wei Liu , =?windows-1252?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=E9?= Cc: Xen-devel , Dario Faggioli , Ian Jackson , Ian Campbell List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 30/07/15 16:45, Wei Liu wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 05:30:58PM +0200, Roger Pau Monn=E9 wrote: >> El 30/07/15 a les 17.12, Wei Liu ha escrit: >>> Update xl manual and disable PV vNUMA in libxl. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu >>> --- >>> Cc: Ian Campbell >>> Cc: Ian Jackson >>> Cc: Dario Faggioli >>> --- >>> docs/man/xl.cfg.pod.5 | 4 ++++ >>> tools/libxl/libxl_create.c | 9 +++++++++ >>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/docs/man/xl.cfg.pod.5 b/docs/man/xl.cfg.pod.5 >>> index c78c3ba..782106c 100644 >>> --- a/docs/man/xl.cfg.pod.5 >>> +++ b/docs/man/xl.cfg.pod.5 >>> @@ -261,6 +261,10 @@ Specify virtual NUMA configuration with positional= arguments. The >>> nth B in the list specifies the configuration of nth >>> virtual node. >>> = >>> +Note that virtual NUMA for PV guest is not yet supported, because >>> +there is issue with regard to cpuid handling that affects PV virtual >> ^ an ^regarding > Added "an", but "with regard to" is a commonly used phrase. "with regards to" or "regarding" are both fine here, but the singular of "regard" is not. ~Andrew