From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1] arm: reduce power use by contented spin locks with WFE/SEV
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 11:47:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55BB5235.3040205@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438339545-22400-1-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com>
On 31/07/15 11:45, David Vrabel wrote:
> Instead of cpu_relax() while spinning and observing the ticket head,
> introduce spin_relax() which executes a WFE instruction. After the
> ticket head is changed call spin_signal() to execute an SVE
> instruction to wake any spinners.
>
> This should improve power consumption when locks are contented and
> spinning.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
x86 bits Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
> ---
> I've not tested this but it looks straight-forward...
> ---
> xen/common/spinlock.c | 5 +++--
> xen/include/asm-arm/spinlock.h | 3 ++-
> xen/include/asm-x86/spinlock.h | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/common/spinlock.c b/xen/common/spinlock.c
> index 29149d1..fc3e8e7 100644
> --- a/xen/common/spinlock.c
> +++ b/xen/common/spinlock.c
> @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ void _spin_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
> while ( tickets.tail != observe_head(&lock->tickets) )
> {
> LOCK_PROFILE_BLOCK;
> - cpu_relax();
> + spin_relax();
> }
> LOCK_PROFILE_GOT;
> preempt_disable();
> @@ -170,6 +170,7 @@ void _spin_unlock(spinlock_t *lock)
> preempt_enable();
> LOCK_PROFILE_REL;
> add_sized(&lock->tickets.head, 1);
> + spin_signal();
> }
>
> void _spin_unlock_irq(spinlock_t *lock)
> @@ -228,7 +229,7 @@ void _spin_barrier(spinlock_t *lock)
> if ( sample.head != sample.tail )
> {
> while ( observe_head(&lock->tickets) == sample.head )
> - cpu_relax();
> + spin_relax();
> #ifdef LOCK_PROFILE
> if ( lock->profile )
> {
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/spinlock.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/spinlock.h
> index 81955d1..311764b 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/spinlock.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/spinlock.h
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> #ifndef __ASM_SPINLOCK_H
> #define __ASM_SPINLOCK_H
>
> -/* Nothing ARM specific. */
> +#define spin_relax() asm volatile("wfe" ::: "memory");
> +#define spin_signal() asm volatile("sev" ::: "memory");
>
> #endif /* __ASM_SPINLOCK_H */
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/spinlock.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/spinlock.h
> index 7d69e75..0c04a4e 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/spinlock.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/spinlock.h
> @@ -4,4 +4,7 @@
> #define _raw_read_unlock(l) \
> asm volatile ( "lock; dec%z0 %0" : "+m" ((l)->lock) :: "memory" )
>
> +#define spin_relax() cpu_relax()
> +#define spin_signal()
> +
> #endif /* __ASM_SPINLOCK_H */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-31 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-31 10:45 [PATCHv1] arm: reduce power use by contented spin locks with WFE/SEV David Vrabel
2015-07-31 10:47 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2015-07-31 10:52 ` David Vrabel
2015-07-31 11:01 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-31 11:41 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-07-31 12:39 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-31 12:43 ` David Vrabel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55BB5235.3040205@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.