From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: CephFS and the next hammer release v0.94.3 Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:43:29 +0200 Message-ID: <55BF8C21.5020204@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IFd0LJ4DAbOJwgLB3txVM48wh0aIUIuuI" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:60677 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753270AbbHCPnb (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Aug 2015 11:43:31 -0400 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Gregory Farnum Cc: Ceph Development , Abhishek L This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --IFd0LJ4DAbOJwgLB3txVM48wh0aIUIuuI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Greg, The next hammer release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/ham= mer passed the fs suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11990#fs). Do you= think it is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? Cheers P.S. http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11990#Release-information has direct = links to the pull requests merged into hammer since v0.94.2 in case you n= eed more context about one of them. --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --IFd0LJ4DAbOJwgLB3txVM48wh0aIUIuuI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlW/jCEACgkQ8dLMyEl6F23MGgCcDrcnWsgaZyGRcEuqUuW1yeH0 jTUAoK9+2Jk30wfsrSU4J0Gs7y8lh3BP =xcrX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IFd0LJ4DAbOJwgLB3txVM48wh0aIUIuuI--