From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Cc: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, nsekhar@ti.com, nm@ti.com,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] serial: 8250: omap: restore registers on shutdown
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 18:54:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55BF9CE0.4080107@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55BF980E.20908@hurleysoftware.com>
On 08/03/2015 06:34 PM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
Hi Peter,
>> struct old_serial_port {
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_omap.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_omap.c
>> index d9a37191a1ae..12249125a218 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_omap.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_omap.c
>> @@ -100,9 +100,9 @@ struct omap8250_priv {
>> u8 wer;
>> u8 xon;
>> u8 xoff;
>> - u8 delayed_restore;
>> u16 quot;
>>
>> + wait_queue_head_t termios_wait;
>> bool is_suspending;
>> int wakeirq;
>> int wakeups_enabled;
>> @@ -256,18 +256,6 @@ static void omap8250_update_mdr1(struct uart_8250_port *up,
>> static void omap8250_restore_regs(struct uart_8250_port *up)
>> {
>> struct omap8250_priv *priv = up->port.private_data;
>> - struct uart_8250_dma *dma = up->dma;
>> -
>> - if (dma && dma->tx_running) {
>> - /*
>> - * TCSANOW requests the change to occur immediately however if
>> - * we have a TX-DMA operation in progress then it has been
>> - * observed that it might stall and never complete. Therefore we
>> - * delay DMA completes to prevent this hang from happen.
>> - */
>> - priv->delayed_restore = 1;
>> - return;
>> - }
>>
>> serial_out(up, UART_LCR, UART_LCR_CONF_MODE_B);
>> serial_out(up, UART_EFR, UART_EFR_ECB);
>> @@ -309,6 +297,7 @@ static void omap8250_restore_regs(struct uart_8250_port *up)
>> up->port.ops->set_mctrl(&up->port, up->port.mctrl);
>> }
>>
>> +static void omap_8250_dma_tx_complete(void *param);
>> /*
>> * OMAP can use "CLK / (16 or 13) / div" for baud rate. And then we have have
>> * some differences in how we want to handle flow control.
>> @@ -322,6 +311,7 @@ static void omap_8250_set_termios(struct uart_port *port,
>> struct omap8250_priv *priv = up->port.private_data;
>> unsigned char cval = 0;
>> unsigned int baud;
>> + unsigned int complete_dma = 0;
>>
>> switch (termios->c_cflag & CSIZE) {
>> case CS5:
>> @@ -473,6 +463,25 @@ static void omap_8250_set_termios(struct uart_port *port,
>> if (termios->c_iflag & IXANY)
>> up->mcr |= UART_MCR_XONANY;
>> }
>> +
>> + if (up->dma && up->dma->tx_running) {
>> + struct uart_8250_dma *dma = up->dma;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * TCSANOW requests the change to occur immediately however if
>> + * we have a TX-DMA operation in progress then it has been
>> + * observed that it might stall and never complete. Therefore we
>> + * wait until DMA completes to prevent this hang from happen.
>> + */
>> +
>> + dma->tx_running = 2;
>> +
>> + spin_unlock_irq(&up->port.lock);
>> + wait_event(priv->termios_wait,
>> + dma->tx_running == 3);
>
> Doesn't the dmaengine api offer a race-free way to wait for pending tx dma
> to complete?
Not that I know of. You still need to ensure that once that DMA
completed, nobody triggers another TX transfer before you do what you
planned. This is ensures by the tx_running != 0 and the spin lock.
> Maybe we could wrap that in the 8250 dma api?
You mean a function in 8250-dma API which does what I did just here
with the wait_event() and the wake_up in the callback? That way I could
move the termios_wait into the dma struct instead of keeping in the
omap specific part. I am also not sure if OMAP is the only one that may
hang here or the other people just didn't notice it yet.
> Regards,
> Peter Hurley
>
>> + spin_lock_irq(&up->port.lock);
>> + complete_dma = 1;
>> + }
>> omap8250_restore_regs(up);
>>
>> spin_unlock_irq(&up->port.lock);
>> @@ -488,6 +497,8 @@ static void omap_8250_set_termios(struct uart_port *port,
>> /* Don't rewrite B0 */
>> if (tty_termios_baud_rate(termios))
>> tty_termios_encode_baud_rate(termios, baud, baud);
>> + if (complete_dma)
>> + omap_8250_dma_tx_complete(up);
>> }
>>
>> /* same as 8250 except that we may have extra flow bits set in EFR */
>> @@ -869,17 +880,18 @@ static void omap_8250_dma_tx_complete(void *param)
>>
>> spin_lock_irqsave(&p->port.lock, flags);
>>
>> + if (dma->tx_running == 2) {
>> + dma->tx_running = 3;
>> + wake_up(&priv->termios_wait);
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> dma->tx_running = 0;
>>
>> xmit->tail += dma->tx_size;
>> xmit->tail &= UART_XMIT_SIZE - 1;
>> p->port.icount.tx += dma->tx_size;
>>
>> - if (priv->delayed_restore) {
>> - priv->delayed_restore = 0;
>> - omap8250_restore_regs(p);
>> - }
>> -
>> if (uart_circ_chars_pending(xmit) < WAKEUP_CHARS)
>> uart_write_wakeup(&p->port);
>>
>> @@ -899,7 +911,7 @@ static void omap_8250_dma_tx_complete(void *param)
>> p->ier |= UART_IER_THRI;
>> serial_port_out(&p->port, UART_IER, p->ier);
>> }
>> -
>> +out:
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->port.lock, flags);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -1216,6 +1228,7 @@ static int omap8250_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> priv->omap8250_dma.rx_size = RX_TRIGGER;
>> priv->omap8250_dma.rxconf.src_maxburst = RX_TRIGGER;
>> priv->omap8250_dma.txconf.dst_maxburst = TX_TRIGGER;
>> + init_waitqueue_head(&priv->termios_wait);
>>
>> if (of_machine_is_compatible("ti,am33xx"))
>> priv->habit |= OMAP_DMA_TX_KICK;
>>
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-03 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-30 22:54 [PATCH 3/3] serial: 8250: omap: restore registers on shutdown John Ogness
2015-07-30 22:54 ` John Ogness
2015-07-31 0:51 ` Peter Hurley
2015-08-03 16:09 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-08-03 16:34 ` Peter Hurley
2015-08-03 16:54 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2015-08-03 19:32 ` Peter Hurley
2015-08-04 11:58 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-08-06 12:27 ` Peter Hurley
2015-08-06 12:31 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-08-06 13:59 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-08-06 18:22 ` Peter Hurley
2015-08-07 0:41 ` Charles Manning
2016-03-02 9:54 ` John Ogness
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55BF9CE0.4080107@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.