From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Jan Tulak <jtulak@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] xfsprogs: blkid is now mandatory
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 10:20:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55BFA2C5.20408@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1326157887.2004059.1438598404429.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
On 8/3/15 3:40 AM, Jan Tulak wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 08:39:36AM -0400, Jan Tulak wrote:
>>> I just found that while it is possible to get blkid on OS X, it is
>>> in 1.0.0 version which doesn't have blkid_probe_get function.
>>> I'm examining whether it is possible to get an updated version there,
>>> but right now, this patch breaks OS X support. Unfortunately I didn't
>>> noticed of this before, as the OS X port was terribly out of date.
>>>
>>> So this patch shouldn't be included until I find how to get around.
>>
>> I don't think this is a lbocker given that OSX support doesn't
>> even work.
>>
>> To the contrary I'd really prefer to go in ASAP to avoid anyone
>> relying on it longer than nessecary.
>
> I tried to get newer blkid on OSX, but so far without a big success
> (well, it looks like a kind of a small dependency hell that would
> have to be ported, with bigger or smaller effort...). With regards
> on the priorities, I think if we can make the OS X support in
> "manual patching required" way, then?
>
> So lets include this patch, and just note it OS X doc "you have to revert
> commit XXX and re-apply any changes to the relevant code"?
IIRC block device signature detection isn't really required, it's just
a nice-to-have; perhaps if blkid isn't present, that functionality can
simply be disabled?
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-03 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-01 16:01 [PATCH] xfsprogs: blkid is now mandatory Jan Tulak
2015-07-01 22:55 ` Dave Chinner
2015-07-02 10:27 ` Jan Tulak
2015-07-02 10:43 ` [PATCH v2] " Jan Tulak
2015-07-03 15:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-07-03 23:45 ` Dave Chinner
2015-07-07 15:10 ` Jan Tulak
2015-07-08 9:14 ` [PATCH v3] " Jan Tulak
2015-07-21 12:39 ` Jan Tulak
2015-07-26 16:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-08-03 10:40 ` Jan Tulak
2015-08-03 17:20 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2015-08-04 15:30 ` Jan Tulak
2015-08-04 16:24 ` Eric Sandeen
2015-08-06 13:13 ` Jan Tulak
2015-08-11 16:40 ` Jan Tulak
2015-07-26 16:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55BFA2C5.20408@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jtulak@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.