From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: roopa Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] mpls: Use definition for reserved label checks Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 14:45:19 -0700 Message-ID: <55BFE0EF.5010000@cumulusnetworks.com> References: <1438620604-18746-1-git-send-email-rshearma@brocade.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Eric W. Biederman" , Thomas Graf To: Robert Shearman Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.220.53]:33368 "EHLO mail-pa0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754337AbbHCVpV (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Aug 2015 17:45:21 -0400 Received: by padck2 with SMTP id ck2so99012491pad.0 for ; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 14:45:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1438620604-18746-1-git-send-email-rshearma@brocade.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 8/3/15, 9:50 AM, Robert Shearman wrote: > In multiple locations there are checks for whether the label in hand > is a reserved label or not using the arbritray value of 16. Factor > this out into a #define for better maintainability and for > documentation. > > Signed-off-by: Robert Shearman > --- Acked-by: Roopa Prabhu