From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: rgw and the next hammer release v0.94.3 Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 12:41:35 +0200 Message-ID: <55C096DF.3080600@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="X3TNu5gDHo3Aadi7SdRu3R7sUi4Lwbqip" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:32900 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755974AbbHDKlh (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2015 06:41:37 -0400 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yehuda Sadeh Cc: Ceph Development , Abhishek L This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --X3TNu5gDHo3Aadi7SdRu3R7sUi4Lwbqip Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Yehuda, The next hammer release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/ham= mer passed the rgw suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11990#rgw and ht= tp://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12502#note-6).=20 Do you think the hammer branch is ready for QE to start their own round o= f testing ? Cheers P.S. http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11990#Release-information has direct = links to the pull requests merged into hammer since v0.94.2 in case you n= eed more context about one of them. --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --X3TNu5gDHo3Aadi7SdRu3R7sUi4Lwbqip Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlXAlt8ACgkQ8dLMyEl6F213MQCdEXVt+KcQnuRXWFrfUyxXTS5p eGMAn27Y3Aw0eXGGWeeQOM+ek0H9nLxo =yjDV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --X3TNu5gDHo3Aadi7SdRu3R7sUi4Lwbqip--