From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: CephFS and the next hammer release v0.94.3 Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 12:47:12 +0200 Message-ID: <55C09830.8040008@dachary.org> References: <55BF8C21.5020204@dachary.org> <55BF978B.9010604@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0RXUvmRSOtFmIPdBQASai3LFcmHO9BCXj" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:32910 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932150AbbHDKrP (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2015 06:47:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "Yan, Zheng" Cc: Gregory Farnum , Ceph Development , Abhishek L This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --0RXUvmRSOtFmIPdBQASai3LFcmHO9BCXj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On 04/08/2015 04:01, Yan, Zheng wrote:> Hi Loic. >=20 > Yes, https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5222 is problematic. Do you mea= n should we include these RPs in v0.94.3? These RPs fix a bug in rare co= nfigure, I think it=E2=80=99s not a big deal to not include it in v0.94.3= =20 Both https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5222 and https://github.com/ceph/c= eph/pull/5427 are already in the upcoming v0.94.3 release that is going t= o be published. Do you think they will cause problem ?=20 Cheers >=20 > Regards > Yan, Zheng >=20 >=20 >> On Aug 4, 2015, at 00:32, Loic Dachary wrote: >> >> Hi Greg, >> >> I assume the "file handle reference counting" is about http://tracker.= ceph.com/issues/12088 which is backported as described at http://tracker.= ceph.com/issues/12319. It was indeed somewhat problematic and required tw= o pull requests: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5222 (authored by Yan = Zheng) and https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5427 (merged by Yan Zheng). >> >> Cheers >> >> On 03/08/2015 18:01, Gregory Farnum wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 6:43 PM Loic Dachary wrote:= >>>> >>>> Hi Greg, >>>> >>>> The next hammer release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tre= e/hammer passed the fs suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11990#fs). D= o you think it is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? >>> >>> I'm on vacation right now, but the only thing I see there that might >>> be iffy is the backport of the file handle reference counting. As lon= g >>> as that is all good (Zheng?) things look fine to me. >>> -Greg >>> >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> P.S. http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11990#Release-information has di= rect links to the pull requests merged into hammer since v0.94.2 in case = you need more context about one of them. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> --=20 >> Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >> >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --0RXUvmRSOtFmIPdBQASai3LFcmHO9BCXj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlXAmDAACgkQ8dLMyEl6F22xiACgwqLs1pLuqFm7X7/hAE1nvRm2 HmYAoJEmylI4R8BTrZEgacUOjrPqOeZo =4yEa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0RXUvmRSOtFmIPdBQASai3LFcmHO9BCXj--