From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sagi Grimberg Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] rdma: split struct ib_send_wr Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 20:54:47 +0300 Message-ID: <55C0FC67.1080104@dev.mellanox.co.il> References: <1438672609-12599-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <55C0F108.4090003@dev.mellanox.co.il> <20150804172328.GA22468@lst.de> <55C0F9FA.6060105@dev.mellanox.co.il> <20150804174720.GA22895@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150804174720.GA22895-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 8/4/2015 8:47 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 08:44:26PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote: >> I do agree that the size on the stack is less of an issue now. What >> still can matter is handling each wr one by one vs. doing a collective >> post. > > But if structured correctly you can still do that with on-stack WRs. No argues. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html