From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Wu, Feng" <feng.wu@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Steve Rutherford <srutherford@google.com>,
"rkrcmar@redhat.com" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] KVM: x86: unify handling of interrupt window
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 13:55:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C34B2B.2050807@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E959C4978C3B6342920538CF579893F0026776F9@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 06/08/2015 08:50, Wu, Feng wrote:
> Is it possible to adjust the code here and remove the later checking in x86.c?
> In that case, we can avoid calling dm_request_for_irq_injection(vcpu) for
> VM exit.
No, see the dm_request_for_irq_injection() changes in patch 9. In that
patch, you can get a IRQ window open vmexit under broader conditions
(e.g. writing to the local APIC's LVT0 register).
dm_request_for_irq_injection() is called just once, so it is inlined.
After patch 9, it boils down to simply
if (!vcpu->run->request_interrupt_window)
return false;
in the common case of in-kernel irqchip. So it costs just one memory
access and a well-predicted branch.
Paolo
> Basically dm_request_for_irq_injection() did the following checks:
>
> - The same as in handle_interrupt_window() below:
>
> if (!irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm) &&
> vcpu->run->request_interrupt_window &&
> !kvm_cpu_has_interrupt(vcpu))
>
> - kvm_arch_interrupt_allowed(vcpu), in which, most of the conditions
> are guaranteed by interrupt window exits, the only one I am not sure
> how to handle is ' to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.nested_run_pending'.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-06 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-05 15:23 [PATCH 0/9] split irqchip series Paolo Bonzini
2015-08-05 15:23 ` [PATCH 1/9] KVM: x86: set TMR when the interrupt is accepted Paolo Bonzini
2015-08-05 15:23 ` [PATCH 2/9] KVM: x86: store IOAPIC-handled vectors in each VCPU Paolo Bonzini
2015-08-05 15:23 ` [PATCH 3/9] KVM: x86: replace vm_has_apicv hook with cpu_uses_apicv Paolo Bonzini
2015-08-05 15:23 ` [PATCH 4/9] KVM: x86: introduce lapic_in_kernel Paolo Bonzini
2015-08-05 15:23 ` [PATCH 5/9] KVM: x86: unify handling of interrupt window Paolo Bonzini
2015-08-06 6:50 ` Wu, Feng
2015-08-06 11:55 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-08-05 15:23 ` [PATCH 6/9] KVM: x86: Split the APIC from the rest of IRQCHIP Paolo Bonzini
2015-08-05 15:23 ` [PATCH 7/9] KVM: x86: Add KVM exit for IOAPIC EOIs Paolo Bonzini
2015-08-05 15:23 ` [PATCH 8/9] KVM: x86: Add EOI exit bitmap inference Paolo Bonzini
2015-08-07 5:43 ` Wu, Feng
2015-08-07 7:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-08-07 7:46 ` Wu, Feng
2015-08-07 10:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-08-07 22:55 ` Wu, Feng
2015-08-05 15:23 ` [PATCH 9/9] KVM: x86: Add support for local interrupt requests from userspace Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55C34B2B.2050807@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=feng.wu@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=srutherford@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.