From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Hendrik Friedel <hendrik@friedels.name>,
Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>,
Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>,
Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Data single *and* raid?
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 09:26:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C40957.9040209@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55C3AE34.8050804@friedels.name>
Hendrik Friedel wrote on 2015/08/06 20:57 +0200:
> Hello Hugo,
> hello Chris,
>
> thanks for your advice. Now I am here:
> btrfs balance start -dprofiles=single -mprofiles=raid1
> /mnt/__Complete_Disk/
> Done, had to relocate 0 out of 3939 chunks
>
>
> root@homeserver:/mnt/__Complete_Disk# btrfs fi show
> Label: none uuid: a8af3832-48c7-4568-861f-e80380dd7e0b
> Total devices 3 FS bytes used 3.78TiB
> devid 1 size 2.73TiB used 2.72TiB path /dev/sde
> devid 2 size 2.73TiB used 2.23TiB path /dev/sdc
> devid 3 size 2.73TiB used 2.73TiB path /dev/sdd
>
> btrfs-progs v4.1.1
>
>
> So, that looks good.
>
> But then:
> root@homeserver:/mnt/__Complete_Disk# btrfs fi df /mnt/__Complete_Disk/
> Data, RAID5: total=3.83TiB, used=3.78TiB
> System, RAID5: total=32.00MiB, used=576.00KiB
> Metadata, RAID5: total=6.46GiB, used=4.84GiB
> GlobalReserve, single: total=512.00MiB, used=0.00B
GlobalReserve is not a chunk type, it just means a range of metadata
reserved for overcommiting.
And it's always single.
Personally, I don't think it should be output in "fi df" command, as
it's in a higher level than chunk.
At least for your case, nothing is needed to worry about.
Thanks,
Qu
>
> Is the RAID5 expected here?
> I did not yet run:
> btrfs balance start -dconvert=raid5,soft -mconvert=raid5,soft
> /mnt/new_storage/
>
> Regards,
> Hendrik
>
>
> On 01.08.2015 22:44, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 10:09:35PM +0200, Hendrik Friedel wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I converted an array to raid5 by
>>>> btrfs device add /dev/sdd /mnt/new_storage
>>>> btrfs device add /dev/sdc /mnt/new_storage
>>>> btrfs balance start -dconvert=raid5 -mconvert=raid5 /mnt/new_storage/
>>>>
>>>> The Balance went through. But now:
>>>> Label: none uuid: a8af3832-48c7-4568-861f-e80380dd7e0b
>>>> Total devices 3 FS bytes used 5.28TiB
>>>> devid 1 size 2.73TiB used 2.57TiB path /dev/sde
>>>> devid 2 size 2.73TiB used 2.73TiB path /dev/sdc
>>>> devid 3 size 2.73TiB used 2.73TiB path /dev/sdd
>>>> btrfs-progs v4.1.1
>>>>
>>>> Already the 2.57TiB is a bit surprising:
>>>> root@homeserver:/mnt# btrfs fi df /mnt/new_storage/
>>>> Data, single: total=2.55TiB, used=2.55TiB
>>>> Data, RAID5: total=2.73TiB, used=2.72TiB
>>>> System, RAID5: total=32.00MiB, used=736.00KiB
>>>> Metadata, RAID1: total=6.00GiB, used=5.33GiB
>>>> Metadata, RAID5: total=3.00GiB, used=2.99GiB
>>>
>>> Looking at the btrfs fi show output, you've probably run out of
>>> space during the conversion, probably due to an uneven distribution of
>>> the original "single" chunks.
>>>
>>> I think I would suggest balancing the single chunks, and trying the
>>> conversion (of the unconverted parts) again:
>>>
>>> # btrfs balance start -dprofiles=single -mprofile=raid1
>>> /mnt/new_storage/
>>> # btrfs balance start -dconvert=raid5,soft -mconvert=raid5,soft
>>> /mnt/new_storage/
>>>
>>
>> Yep I bet that's it also. btrfs fi usage might be better at exposing
>> this case.
>>
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-07 1:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-01 20:09 Data single *and* raid? Hendrik Friedel
2015-08-01 20:24 ` Chris Murphy
2015-08-01 20:32 ` Hugo Mills
2015-08-01 20:44 ` Chris Murphy
2015-08-01 21:45 ` Duncan
2015-08-01 22:26 ` Chris Murphy
2015-08-01 22:34 ` Hugo Mills
2015-08-02 0:27 ` Duncan
2015-08-02 1:14 ` Chris Murphy
2015-08-02 3:46 ` Duncan
2015-08-02 18:31 ` Chris Murphy
2015-08-02 19:06 ` Hugo Mills
2015-08-02 12:54 ` Hendrik Friedel
2015-08-06 18:57 ` Hendrik Friedel
2015-08-07 1:26 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2015-08-07 5:16 ` Hendrik Friedel
2015-08-07 6:25 ` Duncan
2015-08-07 8:11 ` Hugo Mills
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55C40957.9040209@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=hendrik@friedels.name \
--cc=hugo@carfax.org.uk \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@colorremedies.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.