From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=E9?= Subject: Re: Second regression due to libxl: Remove linux udev rules (2ba368d13893402b2f1fb3c283ddcc714659dd9b) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 16:58:57 +0200 Message-ID: <55C4C7B1.8020604@citrix.com> References: <20150728194741.GA13430@l.oracle.com> <55B9E614.4040504@citrix.com> <55C07468.4040909@citrix.com> <20150807145440.GK29527@l.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZNj6w-0002QH-SW for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2015 14:59:06 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20150807145440.GK29527@l.oracle.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, wei.liu2@citrix.com, Ian Campbell List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org El 07/08/15 a les 16.54, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk ha escrit: > Ok. I hadn't run your patch yet. Do you want me to run the latest staging > instead once more with my test-case? Yes please, 40s in my test case seemed to be fine. Roger.