From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: exynos: Fix for memory leak in case SoC name does not match Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 16:36:34 +0900 Message-ID: <55C5B182.6000509@samsung.com> References: <04f401d0ce89$81073900$8315ab00$@kernel.org> <9283770.jQmuxWnYst@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <9283770.jQmuxWnYst@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Kukjin Kim Cc: Viresh Kumar , Lukasz Majewski , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Linux PM list , shailendra.capricorn@gmail.com List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org W dniu 06.08.2015 o 09:23, Rafael J. Wysocki pisze: > On Tuesday, August 04, 2015 04:45:16 PM Kukjin Kim wrote: >> From: Shailendra Verma >> >> During probe free the memory allocated to "exynos_info" in case of >> unknown SoC type. >> >> Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma >> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar >> Acked-by: Lukasz Majewski >> [k.kozlowski: Rebased the patch around if(of_machine_is_compatible)] >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski >> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim >> --- >> Hi Rafael and Viresh, >> >> Since this is a fix to prevent memory leak, it would be better if >> this could be sent to linus during -rc via cpufreq tree. > > I'm not planning more pull requests for 4.2 and this one doesn't seem to be > a good enough reason for a pull request of its own, though. > > Of course, if there are more urgent fixes, I can push it along with them, > but there are none so far. The cpufreq driver will be removed completely in v4.3 or v4.4 with patchset adding cpufreq-dt support for Exynos 4x12. This means that this patch makes sense only for 4.2 and as a stable backport (but it was not marked as such). Anyone thinks that the patch will be worth stable back-porting? Best regards, Krzysztof