From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz-ChpfBGZJDbMAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>,
Ian Munsie <imunsie-8fk3Idey6ehBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Michael Neuling <mikey-/owAOxkjmzZAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>,
linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] misc: remove boundary checks from bin attr users
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 15:51:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C5FB6A.5010300@mleia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150807223456.GA1527@katana>
Hi Wolfram,
On 08.08.2015 01:34, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
>> if we're talking about this particular series, you should have them in
>> your mailbox, since you have them applied in wsa/i2c/for-next:
>
> Those are already in linus tree. I mean all drivers which use struct
> i2c_driver. Or do you prefer they go via Greg? I am fine with both.
>
I think you may find most of the changes applied by Greg into
misc/char-misc-next branch.
The only change from the series, which is not found in
misc/char-misc-next or i2c/for-next is related to at25 driver (IC is
sitting on SPI):
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/26/101
Change 8/8 for sunxi is outdated due to accepted NVMEM framework.
With best wishes,
Vladimir
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
Ian Munsie <imunsie@au1.ibm.com>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] misc: remove boundary checks from bin attr users
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 15:51:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C5FB6A.5010300@mleia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150807223456.GA1527@katana>
Hi Wolfram,
On 08.08.2015 01:34, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
>> if we're talking about this particular series, you should have them in
>> your mailbox, since you have them applied in wsa/i2c/for-next:
>
> Those are already in linus tree. I mean all drivers which use struct
> i2c_driver. Or do you prefer they go via Greg? I am fine with both.
>
I think you may find most of the changes applied by Greg into
misc/char-misc-next branch.
The only change from the series, which is not found in
misc/char-misc-next or i2c/for-next is related to at25 driver (IC is
sitting on SPI):
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/26/101
Change 8/8 for sunxi is outdated due to accepted NVMEM framework.
With best wishes,
Vladimir
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: vz@mleia.com (Vladimir Zapolskiy)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/8] misc: remove boundary checks from bin attr users
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 15:51:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C5FB6A.5010300@mleia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150807223456.GA1527@katana>
Hi Wolfram,
On 08.08.2015 01:34, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
>> if we're talking about this particular series, you should have them in
>> your mailbox, since you have them applied in wsa/i2c/for-next:
>
> Those are already in linus tree. I mean all drivers which use struct
> i2c_driver. Or do you prefer they go via Greg? I am fine with both.
>
I think you may find most of the changes applied by Greg into
misc/char-misc-next branch.
The only change from the series, which is not found in
misc/char-misc-next or i2c/for-next is related to at25 driver (IC is
sitting on SPI):
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/26/101
Change 8/8 for sunxi is outdated due to accepted NVMEM framework.
With best wishes,
Vladimir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-08 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-26 21:18 [PATCH 0/8] misc: remove boundary checks from bin attr users Vladimir Zapolskiy
2015-07-26 21:18 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2015-07-26 21:18 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2015-07-26 21:18 ` [PATCH 1/8] misc: cxl: clean up afu_read_config() Vladimir Zapolskiy
2015-07-26 23:06 ` Daniel Axtens
2015-08-05 7:48 ` Michael Neuling
2015-08-05 7:48 ` Michael Neuling
2015-07-26 21:18 ` [PATCH 2/8] misc: ds1682: clean up ds1682_eeprom_read() and ds1682_eeprom_write() Vladimir Zapolskiy
2015-07-26 21:18 ` [PATCH 3/8] misc: eeprom: 93xx46: clean up eeprom_93xx46_bin_read/write Vladimir Zapolskiy
2015-07-26 21:18 ` [PATCH 4/8] misc: eeprom: clean up eeprom_read() Vladimir Zapolskiy
2015-07-29 7:14 ` Jean Delvare
2015-07-26 21:18 ` [PATCH 5/8] misc: eeprom: max6875: clean up max6875_read() Vladimir Zapolskiy
[not found] ` <1437945502-27944-1-git-send-email-vz-ChpfBGZJDbMAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-26 21:18 ` [PATCH 6/8] misc: eeprom: at24: clean up at24_bin_write() Vladimir Zapolskiy
2015-07-26 21:18 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
[not found] ` <1437945533-27996-6-git-send-email-vz-ChpfBGZJDbMAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-28 6:11 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-07-28 6:11 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-07-26 21:18 ` [PATCH 7/8] misc: eeprom: at25: move eeprom boundary checks to mem_read/mem_write Vladimir Zapolskiy
2015-07-26 21:18 ` [PATCH 8/8] misc: eeprom: sunxi_sid: clean up sid_read() Vladimir Zapolskiy
2015-07-26 21:18 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2015-08-07 16:10 ` [PATCH 0/8] misc: remove boundary checks from bin attr users Wolfram Sang
2015-08-07 16:10 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-08-07 16:15 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2015-08-07 16:15 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2015-08-07 16:15 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2015-08-07 22:34 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-08-07 22:34 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-08-08 12:51 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy [this message]
2015-08-08 12:51 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2015-08-08 12:51 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
[not found] ` <55C5FB6A.5010300-ChpfBGZJDbMAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-08 16:49 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-08-08 16:49 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-08-08 16:49 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55C5FB6A.5010300@mleia.com \
--to=vz-chpfbgzjdbmavxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org \
--cc=gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=imunsie-8fk3Idey6ehBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jdelvare-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mikey-/owAOxkjmzZAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.