Re: [PATCH v1] Change rte_eal_vdev_init to update port_id

[Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa@igel.co.jp>]

On 2015/08/08 7:06, Ravi Kerur wrote:
> Hi Tetsuya,
>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa@igel.co.jp
> <mailto:mukawa@igel.co.jp>> wrote:
>
>     On 2015/08/07 3:04, Ravi Kerur wrote:
>     > diff --git a/drivers/net/enic/enic_ethdev.c
>     b/drivers/net/enic/enic_ethdev.c
>     > index 8280cea..472ef5a 100644
>     > --- a/drivers/net/enic/enic_ethdev.c
>     > +++ b/drivers/net/enic/enic_ethdev.c
>     > @@ -36,8 +36,8 @@
>     >  #include <stdio.h>
>     >  #include <stdint.h>
>     >
>     > -#include <rte_dev.h>
>     >  #include <rte_pci.h>
>     > +#include <rte_dev.h>
>     >  #include <rte_ethdev.h>
>     >  #include <rte_string_fns.h>
>
>     Hi Ravi,
>
>     Do we need this fixing?
>
>     >
>     > diff --git a/drivers/net/mpipe/mpipe_tilegx.c
>     b/drivers/net/mpipe/mpipe_tilegx.c
>     > index 743feef..6e3e304 100644
>     > --- a/drivers/net/mpipe/mpipe_tilegx.c
>     > +++ b/drivers/net/mpipe/mpipe_tilegx.c
>     > @@ -1582,6 +1582,7 @@ rte_pmd_mpipe_devinit(const char *ifname,
>     >       if (!eth_dev) {
>     >               RTE_LOG(ERR, PMD, "%s: Failed to allocate
>     device.\n", ifname);
>     >               rte_free(priv);
>     > +             return -ENOMEM;
>
>     How about separating this fixing from the patch, and put it as an
>     one of
>     cleanup patch series?
>
>
> rte_pmd_mpipe_devinit is the init func pointer called via
> rte_eal_vdev_init. Since we were fixing rte_eal_vdev_init thought of
> taking care of mpipe issue. If you think it's unrelated to this patch
> I will send a separate one.
>

Hi Ravi,

To avoid segmentation fault like above has a point, even if rest of this
patch won't be applied.
So I guess it's nice to separate the patch.


Thanks,
Tetsuya