From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 86A55E00A81; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 14:54:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [54.187.51.154 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from lists.s-osg.org (lists.s-osg.org [54.187.51.154]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 682D7E00A7D for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 14:54:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.131] (199.50.23.95.dynamic.jazztel.es [95.23.50.199]) by lists.s-osg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE86546328; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 14:54:16 -0700 (PDT) To: Andrei Gherzan References: <1438245251-20437-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> <55C082ED.6030405@technux.se> <55C0E347.9030508@osg.samsung.com> <929d9c24776929cd07c370278d4c2768@technux.se> <55C306C6.5040703@osg.samsung.com> <20150809230114.GK17962@resin> <55C85A7B.4010008@osg.samsung.com> <20150810213411.GC4718@resin> From: Javier Martinez Canillas Message-ID: <55C91D85.5070400@osg.samsung.com> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 23:54:13 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150810213411.GC4718@resin> Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Derek Foreman Subject: Re: [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 0/5] Add support for 4.1 kernel with vc4 DRM/KMS driver X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 21:54:25 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Andrei, On 08/10/2015 11:34 PM, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:02:03AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: [snip] >>>>> >>> >>> That would definitely be the preferate way but would involve some additional >>> work in tracking the patches. So, as an initial state, I am fine with a >>> different kernel recipe (with a different name). >>> >> >> Ok, I was waiting for your feedback before preparing v2. > > I guess this is my feedback. We can go on a separate linux provider for now. > Something like linux-raspbery-vc.bb . Or, if you want to maintain the patches > we can only pull in patches and apply them on top of 4.X based on a FEATURE. > What do you think? > Yes, sorry I meant that I didn't post a v2 before because I was waiting for you but now I've all your feedback from your previous emails. I agree that is better to have a separate recipe (with all the patches unconditionally applied) and drop the feature for now. Is just that I was busy today with other stuff but I'll post a v2 this week for sure! > -- > Andrei Gherzan > Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America