From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 3FFB6E00A3B; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 02:54:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from www.dynamicdevices.co.uk (www.dynamicdevices.co.uk [89.200.136.37]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C730FE00A26 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 02:54:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.dynamicdevices.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AB2F27E329; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 09:54:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at lennoab2.miniserver.com Received: from www.dynamicdevices.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (www.dynamicdevices.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7bw5JQnjRDzL; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 09:54:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (cpc47-live22-2-0-cust92.17-2.cable.virginm.net [86.17.157.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.dynamicdevices.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6C83527E30B; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 09:54:19 +0000 (UTC) To: Joshua Lock , yocto@yoctoproject.org References: <55CB0F2C.3020403@dynamicdevices.co.uk> <1439371552.2733.1.camel@collabora.co.uk> <1439372740.2733.4.camel@collabora.co.uk> From: Alex J Lennon Message-ID: <55CB17C2.1000201@dynamicdevices.co.uk> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:54:10 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1439372740.2733.4.camel@collabora.co.uk> Subject: Re: [meta-raspberrypi] RFC on choice of tool for patch review X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 09:54:27 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/08/2015 10:45, Joshua Lock wrote: > On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 10:25 +0100, Joshua Lock wrote: >> On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 10:17 +0100, Alex J Lennon wrote: >>> We've been having a discussion on a way forward to manage patches >>> and >>> code review and would like to open this up for discussion to agree >>> a >>> way >>> forward. >> There's http://patchwork.openembedded.org/. I'm not sure who >> maintains >> it, nor if anyone uses it, but patches sent to the mailing list end >> up >> there. >> >> OOI who are "we" in this context? What benefits would a change bring? > I managed to miss both the [yocto] and [meta-raspberrypi] tags on this > mail, apologies for that. I guess that "we" are the meta-raspberrypi > maintainers. Yes :) Andrei (maintainer) was using Gerrit but that went away for reasons outlined in the preceding email. Some visibility and control of the review process has been lost as a result and so it was suggested we kick off a conversation on what tooling to use to restore that. > Still, the patchwork instance may be an option? The meta-freescale > layers appear to be using it. Many thanks! Cheers, Alex