All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Catterall <Ben.Catterall@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: keir@xen.org, ian.campbell@citrix.com,
	george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
	tim@xen.org, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] HVM x86 enhancements to run Xen deprivileged mode operations
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 12:27:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55CB2D9A.7060001@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55CB3303020000780009A0B8@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>


On 12/08/15 10:50, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 06.08.15 at 18:45, <Ben.Catterall@citrix.com> wrote:
>> Performance testing
>> -------------------
>> Performance testing indicates that the overhead for this deprivileged mode is
>> approximately 25%. This overhead is the cost of moving into deprivileged mode
>> and then fully back out of deprivileged mode.
>>
>> I performed 100000 writes to a single I/O port on an Intel 2.2GHz Xeon
>> E5-2407 0 processor. This was done from a python script within the HVM guest
>> using time.time() and running Debian Jessie. Each write was trapped to cause a
>> vmexit and the time for each write was calculated. These experiments were
>> repeated. Note that only the host and this HVM guest were running (both Debian
>> Jessie) during the experiments.
>
> I'm not sure I/O port writes (the more without saying to which port)
> are the best suited item for evaluating the overhead: Ideally you
> would pick an operation that is comparably fast (I/O port accesses
> generally aren't if the net effect is that the emulator accesses a
> physical port). But it certainly serves as a first indication (not too
> bad, but large enough that I wouldn't be convinced this is a good
> idea).
>
> Jan
>

Thanks for this Jan: I overlooked this.

Retested with the port (0x1000) i/o emulation operation replaced with a 
nop to get the pure overhead. With the operation takes 5.2e-6s and 
without takes 1.7e-6s. So the difference is 3.5e-6. That's about 308% 
overhead on a nop. So, I'm guessing that whether this is used or not 
will depend on the overhead and frequency of the operation it will be 
handling.

Thanks,
Ben

      reply	other threads:[~2015-08-12 11:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-06 16:45 [RFC 0/4] HVM x86 enhancements to run Xen deprivileged mode operations Ben Catterall
2015-08-06 16:45 ` [RFC 1/4] HVM x86 deprivileged mode: Page allocation helper Ben Catterall
2015-08-06 19:22   ` Andrew Cooper
2015-08-07  9:57     ` Ben Catterall
2015-08-07 13:14       ` Andrew Cooper
2015-08-10  8:50       ` Tim Deegan
2015-08-10  8:52         ` Tim Deegan
2015-08-10  8:55           ` Andrew Cooper
2015-08-10 10:08             ` Tim Deegan
2015-08-06 16:45 ` [RFC 2/4] HVM x86 deprivileged mode: Create deprivileged page tables Ben Catterall
2015-08-06 19:52   ` Andrew Cooper
2015-08-07 13:19     ` Ben Catterall
2015-08-07 15:20       ` Andrew Cooper
2015-08-06 16:45 ` [RFC 3/4] HVM x86 deprivileged mode: Code for switching into/out of deprivileged mode Ben Catterall
2015-08-06 20:55   ` Andrew Cooper
2015-08-07 12:51     ` Ben Catterall
2015-08-07 13:08       ` David Vrabel
2015-08-07 14:24       ` Andrew Cooper
2015-08-11  9:45     ` Ian Campbell
2015-08-10  9:49   ` Tim Deegan
2015-08-10 10:14     ` Andrew Cooper
2015-08-11  9:55       ` Tim Deegan
2015-08-11 16:51         ` Ben Catterall
2015-08-11 17:05           ` Tim Deegan
2015-08-11 17:19             ` Andrew Cooper
2015-08-11 18:29               ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-08-12 13:29                 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-08-12 13:33                   ` Andrew Cooper
2015-08-17 13:53                     ` Ben Catterall
2015-08-17 15:07                       ` Tim Deegan
2015-08-17 15:17                         ` Jan Beulich
2015-08-18 10:25                           ` Ben Catterall
2015-08-18 10:26                             ` Ben Catterall
2015-08-18 14:22                               ` Jan Beulich
2015-08-18 16:55                         ` Andrew Cooper
2015-08-19 10:36                           ` Ben Catterall
2015-08-12 10:10               ` Jan Beulich
2015-08-12 13:22             ` Ben Catterall
2015-08-12 13:26               ` Tim Deegan
2015-08-20 14:42       ` Ben Catterall
2015-08-11 10:35     ` Ben Catterall
2015-08-06 16:45 ` [RFC 4/4] HVM x86 deprivileged mode: Trap handlers for " Ben Catterall
2015-08-06 21:24   ` Andrew Cooper
2015-08-07 12:32     ` Ben Catterall
2015-08-07 13:19       ` Andrew Cooper
2015-08-07 13:26         ` Ben Catterall
2015-08-10 10:07   ` Tim Deegan
2015-08-11 10:33     ` Ben Catterall
2015-08-17 13:59       ` Ben Catterall
2015-08-17 14:58         ` Tim Deegan
2015-08-17 15:14           ` Jan Beulich
2015-08-12  9:50 ` [RFC 0/4] HVM x86 enhancements to run Xen deprivileged mode operations Jan Beulich
2015-08-12 11:27   ` Ben Catterall [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55CB2D9A.7060001@citrix.com \
    --to=ben.catterall@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.