All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
To: David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, chriscool@tuxfamily.org, pclouds@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] path: optimize common dir checking
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 11:05:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55CC5DED.5050304@alum.mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1439416645-19173-2-git-send-email-dturner@twopensource.com>

On 08/12/2015 11:57 PM, David Turner wrote:
> Instead of a linear search over common_list to check whether
> a path is common, use a trie.  The trie search operates on
> path prefixes, and handles excludes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com>
> ---
> 
> Probably overkill, but maybe we could later use it for making exclude
> or sparse-checkout matching faster (or maybe we have to go all the way
> to McNaughton-Yamada for that to be truly worthwhile).

Let's take a step back.

We have always had a ton of code that uses `git_path()` and friends to
convert abstract things into filesystem paths. Let's take the
reference-handling code as an example:

`git_path("refs/heads/master")` returns something like
".git/refs/heads/master", which happens to be the place where we would
store a loose reference with that name. But in reality,
"refs/heads/master" is a reference name, not a fragment of a path. It's
just that the reference code knows that the transformation done by
`git_path()` *accidentally* happens to convert a reference name into the
name of the path of the corresponding loose reference file.

In fact, the reference code is even smarter than that. It knows that
within submodules, `git_path()` does *not* do the right mapping. In
those cases it calls `git_path_submodule()` instead.

But now we have workspaces, and things have become more complicated.
Some references are stored in `$GIT_DIR`, while others are stored in
`$GIT_COMMON_DIR`. Who should know all of these details?

The current answer is that the reference-handling code remains (mostly)
ignorant of workspaces. It just stupidly calls `git_path()` (or
`git_path_submodule()`) regardless of the reference name. It is
`git_path()` that has grown the global insight to know which files are
now stored in `$GIT_COMMON_DIR` vs `$GIT_DIR`. Now it helpfully
transforms "refs/heads/master" into "$GIT_COMMON_DIR/refs/heads/master"
but transforms "refs/worktree/foo" into "$GIT_DIR/refs/worktree/foo". It
has developed similar insight into lots of other file types. IT KNOWS
TOO MUCH. And because of that, it become a lot more complicated and
might even be a performance problem.

This seems crazy to me. It is the *reference* code that should know
whether a particular reference should be stored under `$GIT_DIR` or
`$GIT_COMMON_DIR`, or indeed whether it should be stored in a database.

We should have two *stupid* functions, `git_workspace_path()` and
`git_common_path()`, and have the *callers* decide which one to call.

The only reason to retain a knows-everything `git_path()` function is as
a crutch for 3rd-party applications that think they are clever enough to
grub around in `$GIT_DIR` at the filesystem level. But that should be
highly discouraged, and we should make it our mission to provide
commands that make it unnecessary.

Michael

-- 
Michael Haggerty
mhagger@alum.mit.edu

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-08-13  9:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-12 21:57 [PATCH v3 1/4] refs: clean up common_list David Turner
2015-08-12 21:57 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] path: optimize common dir checking David Turner
2015-08-12 22:48   ` Junio C Hamano
2015-08-13  9:05   ` Michael Haggerty [this message]
2015-08-14 17:04     ` Junio C Hamano
2015-08-14 20:04       ` David Turner
2015-08-14 20:27         ` Junio C Hamano
2015-08-14 20:54           ` David Turner
2015-08-15 18:20         ` Michael Haggerty
2015-08-15 18:12       ` Michael Haggerty
2015-08-17 15:55         ` Junio C Hamano
2015-08-15  7:59   ` Duy Nguyen
2015-08-16  5:04     ` David Turner
2015-08-16 12:20       ` Duy Nguyen
2015-08-12 21:57 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] refs: make refs/worktree/* per-worktree David Turner
2015-08-13 17:15   ` Eric Sunshine
2015-08-13 17:41     ` David Turner
2015-08-13 20:16       ` Michael Haggerty
2015-08-13 20:32         ` David Turner
2015-08-14  8:18           ` Michael Haggerty
2015-08-14 17:10             ` Junio C Hamano
2015-08-15  8:04   ` Duy Nguyen
2015-08-12 21:57 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] bisect: make bisection refs per-worktree David Turner
2015-08-15  7:44 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] refs: clean up common_list Duy Nguyen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55CC5DED.5050304@alum.mit.edu \
    --to=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
    --cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
    --cc=dturner@twopensource.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.