From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Josh Durgin Subject: Re: infernalis feature freeze Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 14:26:36 -0700 Message-ID: <55CD0B8C.6090907@redhat.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43440 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751682AbbHMV0g (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2015 17:26:36 -0400 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E62E6A97 for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 21:26:35 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sage Weil , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org It'd be nice to get omap in the python bindings, it's been a pain not having it several times: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5272 On 08/12/2015 02:20 PM, Sage Weil wrote: > The infernalis feature freeze is coming up Real Soon Now. I've marked > some of the pull requests on github that I would like to see merged. > Please take a look: > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+milestone%3Ainfernalis > > Ideally we should focus our testing efforts on whatever is on this list. > > I didn't look at the bug fix PRs carefully since generally these go in > once tested regardless of any feature freeze, but I suggest we mark things > that need to make it into infernalis anyway so that we focus our efforts. > > The big items on my list that are pending testing are: > > wip-newstore-sort (teuthology running now) > wip-newstore (will be marked experimental) > wip-osd-compat (enforces upgrades include hammer, needs qa) > wip-user (run daemons as user 'ceph') > proxy writes (Sam is testing this) > bufferlist tuning (performance) > MOSDOp staged decoding (performance) > > There's tons of other stuff pending that is not on this list. As always, > our ability to merge code is limited primarily on our ability to test > it--we can't afford to destabilize core ceph by merging something that we > aren't confident will work correctly and will not easily break down the > line. If you have something pending that you want to get in, the single > biggest thing you can do to help that happen is to write more or better > tests for it (e.g., things that run during 'make check') and to run the > teuthology regression suite (see Loic's recent blogs about doing this with > OpenStack[1]). > > Thanks! > sage > > [1] http://dachary.org/?p=3852