From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id B1C94E00A3C; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 23:42:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, * medium trust * [147.11.1.11 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 540D1E00707 for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 23:42:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id t7E6g1nB005531 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 13 Aug 2015 23:42:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.162.176] (128.224.162.176) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.235.1; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 23:42:00 -0700 Message-ID: <55CD8DB7.5050304@windriver.com> Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 14:41:59 +0800 From: wenzong fan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe MacDonald References: <55CB0D29.9070206@windriver.com> <20150812130556.GA16995@mentor.com> In-Reply-To: <20150812130556.GA16995@mentor.com> Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [meta-selinux] How about remove libcap-ng from meta-selinux? X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 06:42:02 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 08/12/2015 09:05 PM, Joe MacDonald wrote: > [[yocto] [meta-selinux] How about remove libcap-ng from meta-selinux?] On 15.08.12 (Wed 17:08) wenzong fan wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> There's a libcap-ng in meta-oe layer, it has been updated to 0.7.7 and the >> one in meta-selinux is 0.7.3. >> >> How about removing the one in meta-selinux and get this layer depends on >> meta-oe? Any suggestions? > > The last time we had this discussion my sense was that most users of > meta-selinux wanted to continue with it only depending on oe-core. > That's my preference as well. > > I'm happy to merge an updated version of libcap-ng (or maybe I'll get to > it myself, since I've known about it since Armin removed it from > meta-security, that was the time of the last discussion, I think). > > All I'm saying right now is that this isn't a case of accidental > duplication of recipes in multiple layers, it's the result of a > conscious decision. It's totally worthwhile re-visiting that decision, > though to make sure the reasons are still valid. > Thanks for clarifying this, just send out an update patch for libcap-ng. Wenzong