From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shannon Zhao Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Port two ACPI fixes from Linux Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 22:37:10 +0800 Message-ID: <55CDFD16.1020902@linaro.org> References: <1439523368-22256-1-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> <55CDDE13020000780009AF7B@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <55CDF83C.9070204@linaro.org> <55CE1758020000780009B1BA@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <55CE1758020000780009B1BA@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich , Shannon Zhao Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 2015/8/14 22:29, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 14.08.15 at 16:16, wrote: >> On 2015/8/14 18:24, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>>> On 14.08.15 at 05:36, wrote: >>>> From: Shannon Zhao >>>> >>>> Len Brown (1): >>>> ACPI: disable ACPI cleanly when bad RSDP found >>>> >>>> Tomasz Nowicki (1): >>>> ACPI/table: Always count matched and successfully parsed entries >>> >>> These look good now, but is there a reason you didn't also port >>> the third commit I had referred you to (95df812dbd)? >>> >> >> Oh, sorry, forgot that. So this two patches could go first and port >> 95df812dbd later or send a new version with 95df812dbd? > > Since the patches will have to wait for the tree to re-open, there's > no big difference to me (I'd hope to have the 3rd patch from you > by the time they all could get committed). > Ok, will send a new version. Thanks, -- Shannon