From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44634) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZQH3F-0008OY-A6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Aug 2015 11:37:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZQH3B-0003dA-9h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Aug 2015 11:37:49 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.131]:57811) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZQH3A-0003ct-WD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Aug 2015 11:37:45 -0400 References: <1439564366-11633-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> From: Laurent Vivier Message-ID: <55CE0B40.5000306@vivier.eu> Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 17:37:36 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1439564366-11633-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/11] Proposed format for m68k flags List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Henderson , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, gerg@uclinux.org Le 14/08/2015 16:59, Richard Henderson a écrit : > As promised a couple of days ago, with the addition of CC_OP_CMP, > which wasn't in the text of my proposal the other day. From the > looks of the generated code, I believe this is ideal. > > The following is based on Laurent's 8/30 Update cpu flags management. > > FWIW, there's something in the last patch here that breaks the > coldfire kernel I've been testing (it may even be a bug in tcg; > the problem only appears well into the boot process). But I'm > about to go away for the weekend and still wanted to include it > to show what can be done. > > For convenience, the complete tree pushed to > > git://github.com/rth7680/qemu.git tgt-m68k > Thanks, I'll try to review and test this this week-end. Laurent