diff for duplicates of <55D1948C.6080501@linux.intel.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index cb2b1e7..93fd75e 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ On 15.08.2015 18:13, Guenter Roeck wrote:
 >> lib/sysfs.c:665:
 >> if ((!subsys || !strcmp(subsys, "i2c")) &&
 >>      sscanf(dev_name, "%hd-%x", &entry.chip.bus.nr,
->>             &entry.chip.addr) == 2) {
+>>             &entry.chip.addr) = 2) {
 >> ...
 >>
 >> Therefore, in theory, sensors that were previously visible by running
@@ -49,7 +49,12 @@ If I remember correctly ACPI ID should not ever change and instance id
 device is disabled or not plugged. But I'm not absolute sure about this.
 
 At least on a test platform that allow disable devices will show those 
-devices off-line (/sys/bus/acpi/devices/INTABCD:xy/status == 0).
+devices off-line (/sys/bus/acpi/devices/INTABCD:xy/status = 0).
 
 -- 
 Jarkko
+
+_______________________________________________
+lm-sensors mailing list
+lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
+http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 5489003..461a343 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
  "ref\01439581034-5972-1-git-send-email-dustin@cumulusnetworks.com\0"
  "ref\020150815151302.GA10020@roeck-us.net\0"
  "From\0Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [RFC 0/1] i2c: acpi: revert setting a \"stable\" device name\0"
- "Date\0Mon, 17 Aug 2015 11:00:12 +0300\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [lm-sensors] [RFC 0/1] i2c: acpi: revert setting a \"stable\" device name\0"
+ "Date\0Mon, 17 Aug 2015 08:00:12 +0000\0"
  "To\0Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>"
  " Dustin Byford <dustin@cumulusnetworks.com>\0"
  "Cc\0Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>"
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
  ">> lib/sysfs.c:665:\n"
  ">> if ((!subsys || !strcmp(subsys, \"i2c\")) &&\n"
  ">>      sscanf(dev_name, \"%hd-%x\", &entry.chip.bus.nr,\n"
- ">>             &entry.chip.addr) == 2) {\n"
+ ">>             &entry.chip.addr) = 2) {\n"
  ">> ...\n"
  ">>\n"
  ">> Therefore, in theory, sensors that were previously visible by running\n"
@@ -65,9 +65,14 @@
  "device is disabled or not plugged. But I'm not absolute sure about this.\n"
  "\n"
  "At least on a test platform that allow disable devices will show those \n"
- "devices off-line (/sys/bus/acpi/devices/INTABCD:xy/status == 0).\n"
+ "devices off-line (/sys/bus/acpi/devices/INTABCD:xy/status = 0).\n"
  "\n"
  "-- \n"
- Jarkko
+ "Jarkko\n"
+ "\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "lm-sensors mailing list\n"
+ "lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org\n"
+ http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
 
-b41e02e9b50e24090d129b599e5d283d3f46cd192726489fc940d5ac7bc4c3c6
+f7be5dde682e6adea4226d88eea3a472210f012d682d3eaf08cc3113a3d777fd
