All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@gmail.com>
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@gmail.com>, noisyb@a6.25u.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Hello everyone <3
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:04:15 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55D1DBCF.7090809@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150815205011.15648b9f@as>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1402 bytes --]

On 2015-08-15 20:50, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 02:00:34 +0200
> noisyb@a6.25u.com wrote:
>
>> Question: Wouldn't it be a good idea to enforce the Linux trademark
>> (somewhen) in a way that all these streamlined operating systems use the
>> word "Linux" more carefully (or not at all) in their promotional
>> material? To make sure "correlation" isn't (deliberately) twisted into
>> "causation" by the media /if/ the streamlining trend starts to cause
>> serious regressions in transparency and reliability?
>>
>> Or is that too much politics for the weekend?
>
> Concern troll is concerned.
The way he stated his concern is of course not well thought out if he 
wants anyone to act on it, and I do not at all condone it, but his point 
is valid, people associating the regressions and instabilities that 
systemd (or any other software that runs on Linux) with Linux itself is 
not good for the public perception of Linux.

There are already a lot of people who associate the insanity that is 
userspace library version incompatibilities (GNOME, KDE, GTK+, and Qt, 
just to name a few) with the term 'Linux', and many people don't 
differentiate between the Linux kernel and the userspace on top of it 
unless that userspace is actively hiding the unixisms from the user 
(SteamOS and ChromeOS being a excellent example of doing such 
abstractions right).


[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 3019 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-17 13:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-16  0:00 Hello everyone <3 noisyb
2015-08-16  0:50 ` Chuck Ebbert
2015-08-17 13:04   ` Austin S Hemmelgarn [this message]
2015-08-19 23:01     ` noisyb

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55D1DBCF.7090809@gmail.com \
    --to=ahferroin7@gmail.com \
    --cc=cebbert.lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=noisyb@a6.25u.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.