From: Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@gmail.com>
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@gmail.com>, noisyb@a6.25u.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Hello everyone <3
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:04:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55D1DBCF.7090809@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150815205011.15648b9f@as>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1402 bytes --]
On 2015-08-15 20:50, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 02:00:34 +0200
> noisyb@a6.25u.com wrote:
>
>> Question: Wouldn't it be a good idea to enforce the Linux trademark
>> (somewhen) in a way that all these streamlined operating systems use the
>> word "Linux" more carefully (or not at all) in their promotional
>> material? To make sure "correlation" isn't (deliberately) twisted into
>> "causation" by the media /if/ the streamlining trend starts to cause
>> serious regressions in transparency and reliability?
>>
>> Or is that too much politics for the weekend?
>
> Concern troll is concerned.
The way he stated his concern is of course not well thought out if he
wants anyone to act on it, and I do not at all condone it, but his point
is valid, people associating the regressions and instabilities that
systemd (or any other software that runs on Linux) with Linux itself is
not good for the public perception of Linux.
There are already a lot of people who associate the insanity that is
userspace library version incompatibilities (GNOME, KDE, GTK+, and Qt,
just to name a few) with the term 'Linux', and many people don't
differentiate between the Linux kernel and the userspace on top of it
unless that userspace is actively hiding the unixisms from the user
(SteamOS and ChromeOS being a excellent example of doing such
abstractions right).
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 3019 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-17 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-16 0:00 Hello everyone <3 noisyb
2015-08-16 0:50 ` Chuck Ebbert
2015-08-17 13:04 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn [this message]
2015-08-19 23:01 ` noisyb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55D1DBCF.7090809@gmail.com \
--to=ahferroin7@gmail.com \
--cc=cebbert.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noisyb@a6.25u.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.