From: Christopher J. Morrone <morrone2@llnl.gov>
To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
Subject: [lustre-devel] lctl conf_param vs set_param -P
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 11:00:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55D372B7.1080700@llnl.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB_j=MfmkTWAgLbY=QqyOiUVi6s=zn7aH+SZdSUEBjK5q+=3SA@mail.gmail.com>
On 08/17/2015 08:37 PM, Nathan Rutman wrote:
> The goal of set_param -P (permanent, global) was to replace conf_param
> and harmonize with set_param (local). (conf_param semantics were the
> beginning of an aborted attempt to move away from /proc and toward a
> more rational parameter space.) Unfortunately, most of the conf_param
> items were "specials", that had to be re-implemented under set_param -P.
> Most of that work was done years ago, but some things like "jobid" were
> not around then -- and apparently were implemented using the older
> mechanism only.
Could you elaborate on how jobid is special? Why, set_param -P not
currently knowing that jobid is special, is it not simply triggering the
upcall on all nodes to write a value to the proc file?
How would a system administrator know which things are special and which
are not, and how the behavior changes for special and non-special options?
Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-18 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-17 16:10 [lustre-devel] lctl conf_param vs set_param -P Artem Blagodarenko
2015-08-17 18:06 ` Christopher J. Morrone
2015-08-18 3:37 ` Nathan Rutman
2015-08-18 18:00 ` Christopher J. Morrone [this message]
2015-08-18 11:06 ` Artem Blagodarenko
2015-08-19 2:37 ` Kit Westneat
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-08-21 22:05 Di
2015-08-15 0:07 Dilger, Andreas
2015-08-15 0:36 ` Christopher J. Morrone
2015-08-13 22:43 Di
2015-08-14 20:41 ` Christopher J. Morrone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55D372B7.1080700@llnl.gov \
--to=morrone2@llnl.gov \
--cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.