From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ruben@mrbrklyn.com (Ruben Safir)
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 03:23:00 -0400
Subject: Safety in Kernel Development
In-Reply-To: <CAK7rcp9fzmU28iJEFdbTD2Z5h8wgaGSHoJXDNEy_4QVcGJx=Nw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAK7rcp93Jvy73RxDLKnMgMBoiYz75P5pii6v=nXhZhWEArrRmw@mail.gmail.com>	<55D3B157.50106@mrbrklyn.com>
	<CAK7rcp9fzmU28iJEFdbTD2Z5h8wgaGSHoJXDNEy_4QVcGJx=Nw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <55D42ED4.5060005@mrbrklyn.com>
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
List-Id: kernelnewbies.lists.kernelnewbies.org

On 08/18/2015 08:30 PM, Kenneth Adam Miller wrote:
> | "this is not a rational approach"
> 
> I'm very strongly confident the approach of achieving stronger guarantees


Off topic