From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com (arroyo.ext.ti.com [192.94.94.40]) by arago-project.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C905A529B5 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 18:45:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dlelxv90.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by arroyo.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t7JIj45f005740 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 13:45:04 -0500 Received: from DLEE71.ent.ti.com (dlee71.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.114]) by dlelxv90.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t7JIj4LU002479 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 13:45:04 -0500 Received: from dlep33.itg.ti.com (157.170.170.75) by DLEE71.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.114) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 13:45:03 -0500 Received: from [10.218.109.201] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dlep33.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t7JIj3sg028545; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 13:45:03 -0500 Message-ID: <55D4CEAF.3040309@ti.com> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 14:45:03 -0400 From: Jacob Stiffler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Denys Dmytriyenko References: <1439552740-15530-1-git-send-email-j-stiffler@ti.com> <20150818205706.GD6542@edge> <55D45FD0.4020507@ti.com> <20150819171947.GJ6542@edge> In-Reply-To: <20150819171947.GJ6542@edge> Cc: meta-arago@arago-project.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] tisdk-image: Use "TOOLCHAIN_SUFFIX" to find devkit X-BeenThere: meta-arago@arago-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Arago metadata layer for TI SDKs - OE-Core/Yocto compatible List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 18:45:05 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 8/19/2015 1:19 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 06:52:00AM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote: >> >> On 8/18/2015 4:57 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: >>> Jake, >>> >>> This one didn't apply even on daisy - I didn't have much time to look at the >>> issue, but maybe you have an idea what's wrong? >>> >> >> Denys, >> >> I developed this patch in the fido context, and should apply cleanly >> on the master branch. >> >> On fido, there is the commit >> 1ed881223402fdb1ab7f4ffe444d8b4e7f67cb34 to make the SDK filter >> stricter. This has not been implemented on daisy, and causes the >> patch to fail. > Do you need this fixed in daisy? No, though it shouldn't be hard to adapt this to daisy.