From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from a.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.143] helo=radon.swed.at) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ZSJfJ-0005ur-8B for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 06:49:33 +0000 Subject: Re: [kernel.org bug 103071] Dead "security.*" xattr code in ubifs To: Dongsheng Yang , =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_Gr=c3=bcnbacher?= References: <55D52473.7050209@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: snijsure@grid-net.com, Artem Bityutskiy , ben.shelton@ni.com, terry.wilcox@ni.com, mkl@pengutronix.de, "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , gratian.crisan@ni.com, brad.mouring@ni.com From: Richard Weinberger Message-ID: <55D57864.7060404@nod.at> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 08:49:08 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <55D52473.7050209@cn.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Am 20.08.2015 um 02:50 schrieb Dongsheng Yang: > Hi Richard, > Glad to know you are also using fstests for our ubifs. :) > About this case, I checked it and found it's a bug in fstests. Yeah, I'm extending my testbed to use xfstests too. :) I'm sure these tests will uncover some UBIFS issues. > Because when we are setting USE_ATTR_SECURE=yes, the output > would be different with what it expected currently. > So, I will send a patch out to fix it. And with a quick > fix, I found ubifs works well in xattr security. Oh. Good find! Thanks, //richard