From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=E9?= Subject: Re: Design doc of adding ACPI support for arm64 on Xen - version 4 Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 10:20:41 +0200 Message-ID: <55D58DD9.9090500@citrix.com> References: <55D472D4.9010007@huawei.com> <55D49AA1.3030702@citrix.com> <55D54483.5000103@huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <55D54483.5000103@huawei.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Shannon Zhao , xen-devel , Christoffer Dall , Ian Campbell , Stefano Stabellini , Julien Grall , Stefano Stabellini , Jan Beulich , Parth Dixit , andrew@fubar.geek.nz, Boris Ostrovsky , David Vrabel Cc: Hangaohuai , "Huangpeng (Peter)" , Shannon Zhao List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org El 20/08/15 a les 5.07, Shannon Zhao ha escrit: > On 2015/8/19 23:02, Roger Pau Monn=E9 wrote: >> El 19/08/15 a les 14.13, Shannon Zhao ha escrit: >>> XENMAPSPACE "XENMAPSPACE_dev_mmio". The usage of this hypercall >>> parameters: >>> - domid: DOMID_SELF. >>> - space: XENMAPSPACE_dev_mmio. >>> - gpfns: guest physical addresses where the mapping should appear. >> >> This is not complete, you have forgotten to add the idxs field, = > = > Sorry, I didn't use the idx for the mmio region mapping. What's the idx > useful for here? I've already posted this in the previous version, and you agreed on the interface and the usage of the fields, please see: http://marc.info/?l=3Dxen-devel&m=3D143986236212359 The idxs field is explicitly mentioned there with it's usage. Roger.