From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from starfish.geekisp.com (starfish.geekisp.com [216.168.135.166]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 56D4365CBC for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 13:04:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2153 invoked by uid 1003); 20 Aug 2015 13:04:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.72?) (philip@opensdr.com@64.134.178.169) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 20 Aug 2015 13:04:58 -0000 To: Khem Raj , "Burton, Ross" References: <1439787800-21088-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> <5402FBA9-07E4-47CF-983E-E8778B5AE2F6@gmail.com> From: Philip Balister Message-ID: <55D5D076.5000106@balister.org> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 09:04:54 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4 V2] systemd: Upgrade 219 -> 224 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 13:04:59 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 08/19/2015 10:21 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: >> >> On 17 August 2015 at 16:41, Khem Raj wrote: >>> >>> There are many reasons, for me its overlay support for systemd-nspawn, >>> networkd has got many new features that is now usable w.r.t. IP forwarding, >>> vxlan etc. >>> and it has many bug fixed in those 2000 odd commits since 219, no >>> different then any other package upgrades we do in general it keep the >>> upgrade workload lower as we roll the releases. >>> Any specific concerns ? >> >> >> Can we get an updated patch with a clearer commit log? I've also heard that as systemd evolves, more binaries are getting added to the base package that should be packaged separately for people interested in small images. I do not have personal experience here, but wanted to pass along the feedback. We should look at buildhistory packaging differences when we do upgrades. Philip > > sent a v2 with more descriptions >> >> My concerns with the systemd upgrade were simply that until now we were >> tracking the systemd-stable repository. > > it was only in last release that it was switched to use stable > repository in hope that it will help > backporting to 1.8 release any future updates done on 219 easily. We > never were pinned to stable release > it just was a coincidence that 219 was right in time for 1.8 release. > We want to avoid situations where core recipes > from oe-core are overridden in other layers and staying latest helps that. > > If we want to change that policy to >> the latest release, that's fine by me. >> >> Anyone else have an opinion here? >> >> Ross