From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] arm: tegra20: implement early pmic rail configuration
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:01:00 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55D631FC.5010205@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1440057163-20081-2-git-send-email-marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>
On 08/20/2015 01:52 AM, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
> Implement early TPS6586X PMIC rail configuration setting SM0 being
> VDD_CORE_1.2V to 1.2 volts and SM1 being VDD_CPU_1.0V to 1.0 volts.
>
> While those are PMIC power-up defaults the SoC might have been reset
> separately with certain rails being left at lower DVFS states which
> is e.g. the case upon watchdog reset while otherwise nearly idling.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra20/cpu.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra20/cpu.c
> static void enable_cpu_power_rail(void)
> {
> struct pmc_ctlr *pmc = (struct pmc_ctlr *)NV_PA_PMC_BASE;
> u32 reg;
>
> + debug("%s entry\n", __func__);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TEGRA_EARLY_TPS6586X
> + tegra_i2c_ll_init();
> +
> + /* Set SM0 being VDD_CORE_1.2V to 1.2 volts */
> + tegra_i2c_ll_write(TPS6586X_SM0V1_REG, 0x13);
Does the CORE rail get adjusted by DVFS? Hopefully if it does, it is
never set so low that AVP operation at reset is impossible...
> + udelay(1000);
all the delays in this patch seem very large. What drove the choice of
the delay values?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-20 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-20 7:52 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3] arm: tegra20/colibri_t20: early pmic rail configuration Marcel Ziswiler
2015-08-20 7:52 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] arm: tegra20: implement " Marcel Ziswiler
2015-08-20 20:01 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2015-08-20 7:52 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] colibri_t20: enable " Marcel Ziswiler
2015-08-20 20:02 ` Stephen Warren
2015-08-20 7:52 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] colibri_t20: get rid of spurious MAX_I2C_RETRY define Marcel Ziswiler
2015-08-20 19:59 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3] arm: tegra20/colibri_t20: early pmic rail configuration Stephen Warren
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-08-20 23:06 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] arm: tegra20: implement " Marcel Ziswiler
2015-08-24 16:28 ` Stephen Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55D631FC.5010205@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.