From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [RFC] Support of non-indirect grant backend on 64KB guest Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 17:08:35 +0100 Message-ID: <55D74D03.9020301@citrix.com> References: <55D2D0C4.3070700@citrix.com> <55D2DA15.6070105@citrix.com> <55D37D31.9010401@citrix.com> <55D44338.8030108@citrix.com> <55D498B4.2030804@citrix.com> <55D49E1B.4010405@citrix.com> <55D5906C.7070907@citrix.com> <55D5A15C.80206@citrix.com> <20150821160510.GE26663@l.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150821160510.GE26663@l.oracle.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Stefano Stabellini Cc: Julien Grall , =?windows-1252?Q?Roger_Pau_M?= =?windows-1252?Q?onn=E9?= , Ian Campbell , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 21/08/15 17:05, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > I have to concur with that. We can't mandate that ARM 64k page MUST use > indirect descriptors. Then it has to be fixed in the block layer to allow < PAGE_SIZE segments and to get the block layer to split requests for blkfront. David