Re: testing the teuthology OpenStack backend

[Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3500 bytes --]

Hi,

Thanks for sharing, it helps :-)

Cheers

On 21/08/2015 08:09, Zhou, Yuan wrote:
> Hi Loic/Li,
> 
> We have a local Ceph binary repo for our local teuthology testing. I'm using some modified Ceph gitbuilder (https://github.com/ceph/gitbuilder) to create the repo. The things I've changed are:
> 
> 1. modify branch-local to watch our branchs only, otherwise there'll be too many branches to build
> 2. modify make-debs.sh to add *test-dbg packages  (https://gist.github.com/zhouyuan/f4c1c671c1659ece04e1)
> 2. modify autobuilder.sh to make a proper directory and move the binaries there  (https://gist.github.com/zhouyuan/2a2c4d1b20ff42efc351)
> 
> It's still very simple (e,g, only Ubuntu Trusty included) but enough for our tests now. Hope this can help.
> 
> Thanks, -yuan
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Loic Dachary
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 6:24 PM
> To: Li Wang
> Cc: Ceph Development
> Subject: Re: testing the teuthology OpenStack backend
> 
> Hi,
> 
> [cc'ing the ceph-devel list for Zack or Andrew's input]
> 
> On 19/08/2015 11:32, Li Wang wrote:
>> Hi Loic,
>>   we did a test, the results are attached. We found that the network 
>> may be the bottleneck, it seems it will fetch all the packages from 
>> ceph website on the fly, that does take time and cause many failed 
>> jobs, and there are also many dead jobs, what do those mean? Do you 
>> have some suggestions, if possible to enable it fetch the packages 
>> from configurable mirror or even private package repositories?
> 
> You can ssh to the teuthology instance (the host that runs pulpito) and modify the ~/.teuthology.yaml with
> 
>    gitbuilder_host: gitbuilder.ubuntukylin.com
> 
> which will override the default of 
> 
>    gitbuilder_host: gitbuilder.ceph.com
> 
> I've never done that however and maybe Zack or Andrew have advices on how to establish a mirror properly.
> 
> I think having a private package repository that is useable by teuthology is complicated because the package locations, naming conventions and build methods are difficult to reproduce (and I don't fully understand what they are right now).
> 
> Cheers
> 
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Li Wang
>>
>> On 2015/8/8 23:23, Loic Dachary wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 08/08/2015 16:22, Li Wang wrote:
>>>> Hi Loic,
>>>>    Glad to talk with you on IRC about setting up the teuthology 
>>>> OpenStack backend. Once it is ready to run the test in private 
>>>> cloud, and the results could be exported and uploaded to a public 
>>>> place, please let me know asap :)
>>>
>>> I'm working on it, should be ready RSN.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Li Wang
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2015/8/6 23:05, Loic Dachary wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm looking into testing the OpenStack backend for teuthology on a new cluster to verify it's portable. I think it is but ... ;-) I'm told you have an OpenStack cluster and would be interested in running teuthology workloads on it. Does it have a public facing API ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>
>>>
> 
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> 
> N�����r��y���b�X��ǧv�^�)޺{.n�+���z�]z���{ay�\x1dʇڙ�,j\a��f���h���z�\x1e�w���\f���j:+v���w�j�m����\a����zZ+�����ݢj"��!tml=
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]