All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Niebel <list-09_u-boot@tqsc.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot]  armv7 DMA and cache mangement functions
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:54:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55DACDA9.1090502@tqsc.de> (raw)

Hello,

I'm not an expert in the low level details of this area. So please sorry if there are
wrong assumptions in this post post.

Hardware: i.MX6 Solo (TQMa6 on custom Mainboard)
U-Boot: 2014.10
gcc: 4.8.3 

We see an error using TFTP on i.MX6 that seems to triggered, if the code / data size goes
over a limit. Code changes have nothing to do with network stack, network drivers, 
memory mangement. TFTP will completely unusable: device sees frequently erroneous packages 
with different of wierd errors. If code stays below this size all works fine.

Up to now we checked a lot of things. The following brought us to the assumption, that this
could be cache related:

dynamically disable data cache before doing TFTP: 	TFTP works well again
running with disabled L2 cache (data cache enabled):	TFTP works well again

Looking at the code in drivers/net/fec_mxc.c, function fec_recv we see a call to
invalidate_dcache_range before accessing the received ethernet data. When looking at
the code for invalidate_dcache_range in arch/arm/cpu/armv7/cache_v7.c an comparing
how the things done in linux and barebox we noticed that the order of L2 chache / data cache
invalidation is just swapped there. Applying this to the receive code for fec_mxc,
TFTP will work again.

Question: is the order of cache invalidation important?

Thanks

Markus

             reply	other threads:[~2015-08-24  7:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-24  7:54 Markus Niebel [this message]
2015-08-27 17:19 ` [U-Boot] armv7 DMA and cache mangement functions Markus Niebel
2015-08-27 17:41 ` Mark Rutland
2015-08-28  8:43   ` Markus Niebel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55DACDA9.1090502@tqsc.de \
    --to=list-09_u-boot@tqsc.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.